Weight loss with elliptical

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

Joe Humble <joehumble.RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:25:23 +0100, Charles <chuckle.RemoveThis@fun.com> wrote:
>
>
>>My advice old friend, for what it is worth, is to seriously consider
>>consigning them both to their alleged respective "bozo bins"!
>
>The dreaded "alleged killfile"?

Hudson claims that Lee and others who allege to have killfiled him
really have not done so. Despite that, all Lee's responses that I
have seen are ones which are piggybacked on posts of others who quote
Hudson.
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

"JMW" <jmw DeleteThis @event.horizon> wrote in message
news:9nh7g1dhb85qp9etn2e08vrsv3dp92r1c9@4ax.com...
> Joe Humble <joehumble DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:25:23 +0100, Charles <chuckle DeleteThis @fun.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>My advice old friend, for what it is worth, is to seriously consider
>>>consigning them both to their alleged respective "bozo bins"!
>>
>>The dreaded "alleged killfile"?
>
> Hudson claims that Lee and others who allege to have killfiled him
> really have not done so. Despite that, all Lee's responses that I
> have seen are ones which are piggybacked on posts of others who quote
> Hudson.

Generally true John. That was certainly the case in the past.

But Hudson has taken to changing his e-mail addy constantly. sometimes as
much as several times in one day. He is obsessed with inflicting himself on
others. He can't help himself.

I assume that this is a sign of a developing pathology of some kind.

So I do make a comment now and then. But as I had pointed out to the
Hudson-David symbiote many times, I only respond to a small portion of their
posts. Because I really do have them killfiled. If I really did do what
they babble about, the number of posts would be much greater. (Are all
trolls bad at math?)

And I find myself killfiling chucky daily. And sometimes more often than
that.
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:09:44 GMT, Joe Humble <joehumble.DeleteThis@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:25:23 +0100, Charles <chuckle.DeleteThis@fun.com> wrote:
>
>
>>My advice old friend, for what it is worth, is to seriously consider
>>consigning them both to their alleged respective "bozo bins"!
>
>The dreaded "alleged killfile"?

That's the ones, only dopey of Lee likes to be www wise and he refers
to them as his "bozo bin" - allegedly!! ;o)
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:52:13 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"JMW" <jmw DeleteThis @event.horizon> wrote in message
>news:9nh7g1dhb85qp9etn2e08vrsv3dp92r1c9@4ax.com...
>> Joe Humble <joehumble DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:25:23 +0100, Charles <chuckle DeleteThis @fun.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>My advice old friend, for what it is worth, is to seriously consider
>>>>consigning them both to their alleged respective "bozo bins"!
>>>
>>>The dreaded "alleged killfile"?
>>
>> Hudson claims that Lee and others who allege to have killfiled him
>> really have not done so. Despite that, all Lee's responses that I
>> have seen are ones which are piggybacked on posts of others who quote
>> Hudson.
>
>Generally true John. That was certainly the case in the past.
>
>But Hudson has taken to changing his e-mail addy constantly. sometimes as
>much as several times in one day. He is obsessed with inflicting himself on
>others. He can't help himself.
>
>I assume that this is a sign of a developing pathology of some kind.
>
>So I do make a comment now and then. But as I had pointed out to the
>Hudson-David symbiote many times, I only respond to a small portion of their
>posts. Because I really do have them killfiled. If I really did do what
>they babble about, the number of posts would be much greater. (Are all
>trolls bad at math?)
>
>And I find myself killfiling chucky daily. And sometimes more often than
>that.

And so it goes on and on and on and on.... boringly and repetitively,
you boring dopey old bastard..........

zzzzzzzzz.......... zzzzzzzzzz............ <snore>
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

In article <jut7g1thcoci87467ck34vg7clvs84hgea DeleteThis @4ax.com>,
John Hanson <jhanson DeleteThis @northernlinks.com> writes:
[snip]
>
> Fawltey...runs and Inn.
[snip]

*sigh* Haven't seen Fawlty Towers here on PBS in ages

--
Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
jseymour DeleteThis @LinxNet.com | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:46:16 -0000, dbastard RemoveThis @LinxNet.com (Dopey
Bastard) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>In article <jut7g1thcoci87467ck34vg7clvs84hgea RemoveThis @4ax.com>,
> John Hanson <jhanson RemoveThis @northernlinks.com> writes:
>[snip]
>>
>> Fawltey...runs and Inn.
>[snip]
>
>*sigh* Haven't seen Fawlty Towers here on PBS in ages

I really have a hard time typing "an" instead of "and".
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

Larry Hodges wrote:
>
> Speaking of killfiles, I took my two boys to their second class of
> Hunter's Safety tonight. There was a guy who talked for an hour on
> the history of the gun. He talked much of the time about how we
> started by throwing rocks. Then talked at length about sling shots. Then
> talked at length about spears, bows and cross bows, complete
> with dates, where they originated, etc. He then went on to talk
> about bullet trajectory, sighting in rifles, caliber history, etc. While
> interesting, none had anything to do with hunter's safety.

Whereas what you really need is someone to come and explain the difference
between a turkey and a pro cyclist?

I'm guessing your boys already know most of the safety stuff they need.

Peter
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

Peter Allen wrote:
> Larry Hodges wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of killfiles, I took my two boys to their second class of
>> Hunter's Safety tonight. There was a guy who talked for an hour on
>> the history of the gun. He talked much of the time about how we
>> started by throwing rocks. Then talked at length about sling shots.
>> Then talked at length about spears, bows and cross bows, complete
>> with dates, where they originated, etc. He then went on to talk
>> about bullet trajectory, sighting in rifles, caliber history, etc.
>> While interesting, none had anything to do with hunter's safety.
>
> Whereas what you really need is someone to come and explain the
> difference between a turkey and a pro cyclist?
>
> I'm guessing your boys already know most of the safety stuff they
> need.
> Peter

Of course they know all the safety stuff. And I have no problem with them
attending a class that reaffirms all that. The safe handling of a firearm
can never be overstated or over trained. But I just don't see a need for
all the other stuff. If they want to offer a supplementary class in
addition to hunter's safety, great.
--
-Larry

"The troll hasn't been born who can troll us worse than we troll
ourselves." Hugh Beyer
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:38:29 -0700, "Larry Hodges"
<2larry2.TakeThisOut@2maximizesoftware2.com> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>Peter Allen wrote:
>> Larry Hodges wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking of killfiles, I took my two boys to their second class of
>>> Hunter's Safety tonight. There was a guy who talked for an hour on
>>> the history of the gun. He talked much of the time about how we
>>> started by throwing rocks. Then talked at length about sling shots.
>>> Then talked at length about spears, bows and cross bows, complete
>>> with dates, where they originated, etc. He then went on to talk
>>> about bullet trajectory, sighting in rifles, caliber history, etc.
>>> While interesting, none had anything to do with hunter's safety.
>>
>> Whereas what you really need is someone to come and explain the
>> difference between a turkey and a pro cyclist?
>>
>> I'm guessing your boys already know most of the safety stuff they
>> need.
>> Peter
>
>Of course they know all the safety stuff. And I have no problem with them
>attending a class that reaffirms all that. The safe handling of a firearm
>can never be overstated or over trained. But I just don't see a need for
>all the other stuff. If they want to offer a supplementary class in
>addition to hunter's safety, great.

Those classes have had all that stuff since day one, as they should.
Do you think a kid needs to show up to 6-8 3 hour classes to learn
that you should always treat a firearm like it is loaded and has no
safety? A good firearms instructor will talk about all the aspects of
guns and hunting and will keep reaffirming how safety should be the
kids number one priority.
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical 

John Hanson wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:38:29 -0700, "Larry Hodges"
> <2larry2.TakeThisOut@2maximizesoftware2.com> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
>
>> Peter Allen wrote:
>>> Larry Hodges wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of killfiles, I took my two boys to their second class of
>>>> Hunter's Safety tonight. There was a guy who talked for an hour on
>>>> the history of the gun. He talked much of the time about how we
>>>> started by throwing rocks. Then talked at length about sling shots.
>>>> Then talked at length about spears, bows and cross bows, complete
>>>> with dates, where they originated, etc. He then went on to talk
>>>> about bullet trajectory, sighting in rifles, caliber history, etc.
>>>> While interesting, none had anything to do with hunter's safety.
>>>
>>> Whereas what you really need is someone to come and explain the
>>> difference between a turkey and a pro cyclist?
>>>
>>> I'm guessing your boys already know most of the safety stuff they
>>> need.
>>> Peter
>>
>> Of course they know all the safety stuff. And I have no problem
>> with them attending a class that reaffirms all that. The safe
>> handling of a firearm can never be overstated or over trained. But
>> I just don't see a need for all the other stuff. If they want to
>> offer a supplementary class in addition to hunter's safety, great.
>
> Those classes have had all that stuff since day one, as they should.

Not in Oregon. My Dad used to teach Hunter's Safety back when I was a kid.
I had my cert when I was 10, and it was voluntary at that time. And it was
a short course...one day I think. Don't really remember. But none of this
other BS.

In fact, just to day in Field and Stream, I read an article stating that
Hunter's Safety is responsible for the reduction of hunters in highly
regulated states. There is an organization that is pushing for rolling it
back to voluntary. I'm for that.

> Do you think a kid needs to show up to 6-8 3 hour classes to learn
> that you should always treat a firearm like it is loaded and has no
> safety? A good firearms instructor will talk about all the aspects of
> guns and hunting and will keep reaffirming how safety should be the
> kids number one priority.

Ok. So what does the history of rock throwing, the invention of the bow and
spear have to do with that?

In addition, it's offensive that the State doesn't consider me (as in a
regular citizen) capable of teaching my own kids some of this stuff. Again,
it's the Liberal's assumption that we have no common sense. I'm not saying
they should eliminate all I'm complaining about. But offer it as a
voluntary supplementary course for those that want it.
--
-Larry

"The troll hasn't been born who can troll us worse than we troll
ourselves." Hugh Beyer
 >> Stay informed about: Weight loss with elliptical