 |
|
 |
|
Related Topics:
| Bowflex rods snapping - Hi, new to this forum. Sorry if this question has been asked. Had a blowflex for a few months now. The first week out, one of the 10 pound rods snapped in a bizarre double break. I igmored it, not using that rod much. Yesterday though, on eof the big
Hack Squat - Leg Press Machine brand recommendations. - Hello, I am a 50 year old fatman, still lifting weights. I am about to purchase a hack squat - Leg press machine. I am not so worried about leg pressing, but for a little more $$$, it looks like you can get both in one machine. I am Body..
Enter the Barbells - Hello! First I want to say that there seems to be some very folks on these and thanks for taking the time to provide a virtual library of reading material on the subject. I have almost no prior to I was..
Weight training equipment upstairs? - Hi, I'm here to ask for your educated opinions on a potential problem. My son has been asking for a bench with bar and weights. I got him one for He wants to put it in his bedroom on the second floor, which I thought a good idea because..
dumbbell 'equivalent' of pull-ups? - Hi everyone! I've been for a couple of years now using a rope, dumbbells and a bench. I'm happy with the different routines I've used over time, but this setup doesn't allow me to do pull-ups. I have tried bars in door frames, but..
|
|
|
Next: Middle Back pain while on treadmill
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Mar 19, 2007 Posts: 37
|
(Msg. 76) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:13 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights, others (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:35:13 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
>
>"Achim Nolcken Lohse" <lohsea.TakeThisOut@3web.nettax> wrote in message
>news:460444e6.10454114@news.telus.net...
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:18:38 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au>
>
>>>Maybe, but discontinuing a model straight directly after a recall of
>>>800,000
>>>units must tell you something.
>>>I know 1.2 million recalled units just rolls of the tongue but think about
>>>it - this company in the space of 12 months as recalled 1,200,000 units -
>>>can you imagine the expense, the embarassment, the loss of reputation?
>>
>> No need to imagine. Sony and Mercedes Benz have had similar recalls
>> recently. I don't see their brands going down in flames.
>
>The difference is that Sony and MB have delivered excellence over many
>years - so an occasional recall will not cause their rep to be damaged
>unduly. Bowflex delivers something less than excellence
>
So you say. But your only objective evidence is the recall. And since
Sony and Mercedes' recalls are not proof that they are "garbage"
manufacturers, neither can the Bowflex recall provide such proof.
....
>
>Freight alone must average $40-$50. Also what about the return freight - the
>recalls would have been fixed and returned presumeably
You don't know what you're talking about. There was no "return
freight". Bowflex simply sent out an upgrade kit. Furthermore, you
don't seem to understand that large corporations don't pay anywhere
near the surface freight charges ordinary individuals do.
>
>> Keep in mind that all the
>> hardware except for the rods are manufactured abroad. And when you do
>> a mass parts replacement, there are no marketing costs, and
>> production, warehousing, and shipping costs can be minimized because
>> you know how many pieces you need, and where they're going.
>>
>
>Huh?? Minimize all you like there is will be a hard cost involved - double
>freight, handling, labour cost of repairs, cost of parts - there is the
>'marketing' costs of advertising the recall - it is expensive advertising to
>do a recall - $100 a unit would be underestimated
I guess it's miracle then! They not only swallowed these huge costs,
but doubled the warranty of their own accord, and then went on to
produce even more models, larger than the discontinued one, presumably
so they could lose even more money on the next recall.
>
>> OTOH, these costs go a long way toward explaining the very high
>> purchase price of the Bowflex. Marketing, liability, and warranty
>> support are huyge costs.
>>
>> I've been through the same experience with Nordictrack. Thirteen years
>> ago, when I bought my Nordictrack ski exerciser, Nordictrack had the
>> largest exercise machine sales in North America. They also offered the
>> best available warranty - 10 years on all parts. A few years later,
>> they reduced their warranty to two years, and then they went bankrupt.
>>
>So?
So Bowflex has treated its customers better than NordicTrack did.
>
>>
>> Before my ten year warranty had expired, the company was out of
>> business and the warranty was worthless. But before that happened,
>> they replaced the front frame of my machine three times, the front
>> upright twice, and the front pulley system once, partly because of
>> poor design, and partly because of inept pre- and post-sales customer
>> service (it took me two years and six or seven calls to customer
>> service to learn that they had an extended length upright that should
>> have been shipped to me initially because of my height).
>
>What does Nordic Trac have to do with the price of rice in China?
>
>>
>> So, which is a better deal - a cheaper machine that becomes a
>> paperweight when it breaks and the warranty proves worthless, or one
>> that costs 20% or 30% more, but has warranty support and retains
>> market value?
>
>You are making comparisons that have no relevance to the debate - you are
>comparing a toaster with a blender.
Nonsense. Both machines were marketed and received popularly as a safe
and effective way to get fit and stay fit at home.
>Why do you say Bowflex retains market
>value?? I would be very surprised if the 2nd hand machines sold in ebay are
>even approaching half the new price.
The warranty is non-transferable, so there should be a significant
drop in market value on resale. Check out what a perfectly funtioning
NordicTrack will fetch. Or any number of other used exercise machines.
Why do you think people buy new car replacement insurance? The minute
you drive the vehicle off the lot, the market value nosedives, even
WITH a fully transferable warranty.
>
>>
>> I'd say that Bowflex is doing much better than Nordictrack by its
>> customers.
>>
>
>IMO both machines are garbage - Nordictrac hits your hip flexors not much
>different than the discredited air walkers
Well, I've never seen a published dispute of the NordicTrack's
functionality as a cross-country simulator. And it was touted as North
America's most popular exercise machine for many years.
--
Achim
_____/)
axethetax >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 19, 2007 Posts: 37
|
(Msg. 77) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:17 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:37:32 -0000, "Bully"
<bully62 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
.....
>
>So if you fail at the bottom of the leg press, where does the weight go?
That depends on the design of the leg press. But even without any
device to hold the weights, your position on a leg press machine is
inherently more stable and less vulnerable.
.....
>
>How would one lose one's balance during the squat?
How does one EVER loser one's balance? One side is weaker, or there's
a distraction, you have a muscle spasm...
>Hang on,you're the guy
>who injured yourself with a dumbbell or barbell right?
dumbell, doing preacher curls.
>That put a hole through you floor?
No, that was a barbell. It upended off the rack when I pulled the
wrong weight off.
>Have you ever lost your balance whilst squatting?
No.
>
>> or twisting during the squat,
No.
>
>Twisting??? Why would you twist whilst you are squatting?
You get distracted by something, turn your head, who knows? Why would
you twist or lose your balance when you're walking?
I suppose you've never had a weight slip out of your hands either.
--
Achim
_____/)
axethetax >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 19, 2007 Posts: 37
|
(Msg. 78) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:17 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:45:50 -0000, "Bully"
<bully62.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
....
>>
>> There's nothing safe about one-legged exercises. You can injure your
>> back as well as your knee. And you certainly can't do one-legged
>> squats to failure safely.
>
>Why not?
>
You'll lose your balance, twist, and fall to the floor. Do it often
enough, and you're pretty much bound to injure yourself.
But if that's what it takes to be "manly", as 223rem suggests, maybe
it's worthwile for you.
I'll pass. I've got enough injuries and no craving for more
testosterone.
--
Achim
_____/)
axethetax >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2005 Posts: 2882
|
(Msg. 79) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:15 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Achim Nolcken Lohse" <lohsea RemoveThis @3web.nettax> wrote in message
news:4604e23b.50736563@news.telus.net...
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:35:13 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Achim Nolcken Lohse" <lohsea RemoveThis @3web.nettax> wrote in message
>>news:460444e6.10454114@news.telus.net...
>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:18:38 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au>
>>
>>>>Maybe, but discontinuing a model straight directly after a recall of
>>>>800,000
>>>>units must tell you something.
>>>>I know 1.2 million recalled units just rolls of the tongue but think
>>>>about
>>>>it - this company in the space of 12 months as recalled 1,200,000
>>>>units -
>>>>can you imagine the expense, the embarassment, the loss of reputation?
>>>
>>> No need to imagine. Sony and Mercedes Benz have had similar recalls
>>> recently. I don't see their brands going down in flames.
>>
>>The difference is that Sony and MB have delivered excellence over many
>>years - so an occasional recall will not cause their rep to be damaged
>>unduly. Bowflex delivers something less than excellence
>>
> So you say. But your only objective evidence is the recall. And since
> Sony and Mercedes' recalls are not proof that they are "garbage"
> manufacturers, neither can the Bowflex recall provide such proof.
>
> ...
>>
>>Freight alone must average $40-$50. Also what about the return freight -
>>the
>>recalls would have been fixed and returned presumeably
>
> You don't know what you're talking about. There was no "return
> freight". Bowflex simply sent out an upgrade kit. Furthermore, you
> don't seem to understand that large corporations don't pay anywhere
> near the surface freight charges ordinary individuals do.
What does the word 'recall' mean to you? 'recall' means the machine is
returned. Look it up. I know all about freight rates - freight is a major
cost factor no matter how large the company
>
>>
>>> Keep in mind that all the
>>> hardware except for the rods are manufactured abroad. And when you do
>>> a mass parts replacement, there are no marketing costs, and
>>> production, warehousing, and shipping costs can be minimized because
>>> you know how many pieces you need, and where they're going.
>>>
>>
>>Huh?? Minimize all you like there is will be a hard cost involved - double
>>freight, handling, labour cost of repairs, cost of parts - there is the
>>'marketing' costs of advertising the recall - it is expensive advertising
>>to
>>do a recall - $100 a unit would be underestimated
>
> I guess it's miracle then! They not only swallowed these huge costs,
> but doubled the warranty of their own accord, and then went on to
> produce even more models, larger than the discontinued one, presumably
> so they could lose even more money on the next recall.
If they doubled the warranty they would have had to have done it on their
own accord - no one else doubles the warranty. Of course they thought it was
good marketing as they made a mess of their reputation so a longer warranty
would have helped restore some of their shattered reputation
>>
>>> OTOH, these costs go a long way toward explaining the very high
>>> purchase price of the Bowflex. Marketing, liability, and warranty
>>> support are huyge costs.
>>>
>>> I've been through the same experience with Nordictrack. Thirteen years
>>> ago, when I bought my Nordictrack ski exerciser, Nordictrack had the
>>> largest exercise machine sales in North America. They also offered the
>>> best available warranty - 10 years on all parts. A few years later,
>>> they reduced their warranty to two years, and then they went bankrupt.
>>>
>>So?
>
> So Bowflex has treated its customers better than NordicTrack did.
>>
>>>
>>> Before my ten year warranty had expired, the company was out of
>>> business and the warranty was worthless. But before that happened,
>>> they replaced the front frame of my machine three times, the front
>>> upright twice, and the front pulley system once, partly because of
>>> poor design, and partly because of inept pre- and post-sales customer
>>> service (it took me two years and six or seven calls to customer
>>> service to learn that they had an extended length upright that should
>>> have been shipped to me initially because of my height).
>>
>>What does Nordic Trac have to do with the price of rice in China?
>>
>>>
>>> So, which is a better deal - a cheaper machine that becomes a
>>> paperweight when it breaks and the warranty proves worthless, or one
>>> that costs 20% or 30% more, but has warranty support and retains
>>> market value?
>>
>>You are making comparisons that have no relevance to the debate - you are
>>comparing a toaster with a blender.
>
> Nonsense. Both machines were marketed and received popularly as a safe
> and effective way to get fit and stay fit at home.
>
>
>>Why do you say Bowflex retains market
>>value?? I would be very surprised if the 2nd hand machines sold in ebay
>>are
>>even approaching half the new price.
>
>
> The warranty is non-transferable, so there should be a significant
> drop in market value on resale. Check out what a perfectly funtioning
> NordicTrack will fetch. Or any number of other used exercise machines.
> Why do you think people buy new car replacement insurance? The minute
> you drive the vehicle off the lot, the market value nosedives, even
> WITH a fully transferable warranty.
I didn't say that Bowflex held it;s market value - you said it - now you are
saying they lose significantly on resale - so which is it?
>>
>>>
>>> I'd say that Bowflex is doing much better than Nordictrack by its
>>> customers.
>>>
>>
>>IMO both machines are garbage - Nordictrac hits your hip flexors not much
>>different than the discredited air walkers
>
> Well, I've never seen a published dispute of the NordicTrack's
> functionality as a cross-country simulator. And it was touted as North
> America's most popular exercise machine for many years.
>
That;s a laugh - "America's most popular exercise machine" - so what? Ezy
riders were America;s most popular exercise item just a few years ago - now
they are recognized as America's worst piece of junk - add the Air Walkers
to that list - first very popular and then totally discredited
>
>
> --
>
> Achim
> _____/)
> axethetax >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2005 Posts: 2882
|
(Msg. 80) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:58 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Achim, here's the perfect machine for you (was Re: Bowflex shatters under load) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:wuUMh.16976$Jl.15361@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "David" <forgotwhy DeleteThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote
>>> "David" <forgotwhy DeleteThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> "223rem" <223rem DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> http://www.fastexercise.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> ROM - The 4-Minute CrossTrainer. It may be a little pricey, but think
>>>>> of it as a super-ultra-Bowflex.
>>>>
>>>> it is odd that their website doesn't have any photos of the various
>>>> exercises you can do on this machine -
>>>
>>> Order the DVD. It's free.
>>>
>> I'm an instant gratification kind of guy. If I have to wait 3 days and
>> fill out a form . . . anyways I can't justify that kind of denieros - If
>> you have a DVD why not just tell the common folk here wtf it does??
>
> Jason Earl and I have sworn allegience to the Cult of the ROM.
>
> Order the DVD. It's free. There is no subliminal message contained
> therein. You will want to watch it over and over. It's good. Very very
> good.
f--- y--
>
> David
> >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2005 Posts: 2882
|
(Msg. 81) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:24 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Achim, here's the perfect machine for you (was Re: Bowflex shatters under load) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David" <forgotwhy.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:46043f68$0$4753$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad.DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:wuUMh.16976$Jl.15361@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> "David" <forgotwhy.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad.DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote
>>>> "David" <forgotwhy.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>>> "223rem" <223rem.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> http://www.fastexercise.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ROM - The 4-Minute CrossTrainer. It may be a little pricey, but think
>>>>>> of it as a super-ultra-Bowflex.
>>>>>
>>>>> it is odd that their website doesn't have any photos of the various
>>>>> exercises you can do on this machine -
>>>>
>>>> Order the DVD. It's free.
>>>>
>>> I'm an instant gratification kind of guy. If I have to wait 3 days and
>>> fill out a form . . . anyways I can't justify that kind of denieros -
>>> If you have a DVD why not just tell the common folk here wtf it does??
>>
>> Jason Earl and I have sworn allegience to the Cult of the ROM.
>>
>> Order the DVD. It's free. There is no subliminal message contained
>> therein. You will want to watch it over and over. It's good. Very very
>> good.
>
> f--- y--
>
Cohen, you f-----n tricked me! I did order the DVD and then clicked on the
last part and sure enough there is a 6 minute preview
- Dunno about the $15000 price tag - I can see a good rowing machine and a
stepper that is designed for full stretch and I read 'wreck your knees' into
it. I've seen stairclimbers that also have full stretch and you get a better
upper body workout with them than the ROM.
Also I perceive that they left out the chest as a muscle that needs a
workout or is this covered by doing dips? I like the idea of the full range
of motion but you know, you get that on the Total Trainer - absolute full
range of motion for $295 and it slides under your bed! >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 82) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:37 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:46045e71.16993233@news.telus.net,
Achim Nolcken Lohse <lohsea DeleteThis @3web.nettax> typed:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:50:44 -0000, "Bully"
> <bully62 DeleteThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>> Leg
>>>> pressing is far inferior to squatting.
>>>
>>> Could be, if you don't value your knees. I'd rather pay $3500, and
>>> pass on the knee replacement.
>>
>> Is leg pressing better for your knees than squatting?
>
> I think so, and especially with free weights. With a leg press you can
> limit the motion so that you can fail at the bottom turnaround without
> injuring yourself.
So if you fail at the bottom of the leg press, where does the weight go? If
I fail at the bottom of the squat I can just lose the weight onto the
safeties.
> Failing at the bottom of a squat could be extremely
> damaging.
See above
> Add to that the risks posed by losing your balance
How would one lose one's balance during the squat? Hang on,you're the guy
who injured yourself with a dumbbell or barbell right? That put a hole
through you floor? Have you ever lost your balance whilst squatting?
> or twisting during the squat,
Twisting??? Why would you twist whilst you are squatting?
> and I beleive there's a very significant
> advantage to using a well-designed leg press machine.
For the record: IMO you're talking horseshit.
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 83) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:45 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Achim, here's the perfect machine for you (was Re: Bowflex shatters under load) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:mh99031nok06r6lpumikmb7rrtlmkc4c6c@4ax.com,
JMW <jmwilliams.DeleteThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> typed:
> 223rem <223rem.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> David Cohen wrote:> "JMW" <jmwilliams.DeleteThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote
>>
>>> I subscribe to Consumer Reports because, with regard to cars,
>>> appliances, TVs, cameras, etcetera, I look for good values.
>>
>> Consumer Reports considers handling and the fun to drive factor
>> irrelevant. If you like to drive a boring, "reliable" car, then yes,
>> follow their recommendations.
>
> I don't need a vehicle to be a penile surrogate.
You might want one of these though: http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 84) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:45 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:4604bbaf.40867048@news.telus.net,
Achim Nolcken Lohse <lohsea.DeleteThis@3web.nettax> typed:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
> <bakters.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> ... one-legged exercises.... are very safe from a biomechanical
>> point of view
>
> Baloney.
>
> There's nothing safe about one-legged exercises. You can injure your
> back as well as your knee. And you certainly can't do one-legged
> squats to failure safely.
Why not?
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 85) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:47 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Achim, here's the perfect machine for you (was Re: Bowflex shatters under load) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:56k38iF29asamU1@mid.individual.net,
Bully <bully62.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> typed:
> In news:mh99031nok06r6lpumikmb7rrtlmkc4c6c@4ax.com,
> JMW <jmwilliams.RemoveThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> typed:
>> 223rem <223rem.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Cohen wrote:> "JMW" <jmwilliams.RemoveThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com>
>>> wrote
>>>> I subscribe to Consumer Reports because, with regard to cars,
>>>> appliances, TVs, cameras, etcetera, I look for good values.
>>>
>>> Consumer Reports considers handling and the fun to drive factor
>>> irrelevant. If you like to drive a boring, "reliable" car, then yes,
>>> follow their recommendations.
>>
>> I don't need a vehicle to be a penile surrogate.
>
> You might want one of these though: http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaWoo82zNUA
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 15, 2006 Posts: 934
|
(Msg. 86) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:26 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Achim, here's the perfect machine for you (was Re: Bowflex shatters under load) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bully" <bully62.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>Bully <bully62.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> typed:
>> JMW <jmwilliams.DeleteThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> typed:
>>> 223rem <223rem.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> David Cohen wrote:> "JMW" <jmwilliams.DeleteThis@enforcergraphics.f2s.com>
>>>> wrote
>>>>> I subscribe to Consumer Reports because, with regard to cars,
>>>>> appliances, TVs, cameras, etcetera, I look for good values.
>>>>
>>>> Consumer Reports considers handling and the fun to drive factor
>>>> irrelevant. If you like to drive a boring, "reliable" car, then yes,
>>>> follow their recommendations.
>>>
>>> I don't need a vehicle to be a penile surrogate.
>>
>> You might want one of these though: http://www.arielmotor.co.uk/
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaWoo82zNUA
I wonder if it's street-legal in the USA. The ones on the US site do
appear to have a full light package. On the open road, you could
certainly outrun the police, but they probably wouldn't have to do
much research in order to come looking for you at home. >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 12, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 87) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:39 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:4604f44a.55360918@news.telus.net,
Achim Nolcken Lohse <lohsea.DeleteThis@3web.nettax> typed:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:45:50 -0000, "Bully"
> <bully62.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>
>>> There's nothing safe about one-legged exercises. You can injure your
>>> back as well as your knee. And you certainly can't do one-legged
>>> squats to failure safely.
>>
>> Why not?
>>
> You'll lose your balance,
Do you have problems with your balance?
> twist, and fall to the floor. Do it often
> enough, and you're pretty much bound to injure yourself.
>
> But if that's what it takes to be "manly", as 223rem suggests, maybe
> it's worthwile for you.
>
> I'll pass. I've got enough injuries and no craving for more
> testosterone.
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 28, 2005 Posts: 702
|
(Msg. 88) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:24 am
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights, others (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <4604bb6d.40801274 RemoveThis @news.telus.net>,
lohsea RemoveThis @3web.nettax (Achim Nolcken Lohse) wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:49:01 -0600, Hobbes <khobman800 RemoveThis @yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <46045e71.16993233 RemoveThis @news.telus.net>,
> > lohsea RemoveThis @3web.nettax (Achim Nolcken Lohse) wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:50:44 -0000, "Bully"
> >> <bully62 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> >>> Leg
> >> >>> pressing is far inferior to squatting.
> >> >>
> >> >> Could be, if you don't value your knees. I'd rather pay $3500, and
> >> >> pass on the knee replacement.
> >> >
> >> >Is leg pressing better for your knees than squatting?
> >>
> >> I think so, and especially with free weights. With a leg press you can
> >> limit the motion so that you can fail at the bottom turnaround without
> >> injuring yourself. Failing at the bottom of a squat could be extremely
> >> damaging. Add to that the risks posed by losing your balance or
> >> twisting during the squat, and I beleive there's a very significant
> >> advantage to using a well-designed leg press machine.
> >
> >You'd be wrong. There is no danger of failing at the bottom of a squat
> >if you are in a rack. Even if you aren't - olympic style weightlifters
> >fail all the time in front squat or catch without injury.
>
> Really, olympic style weightlifters are NEVER injured when they fail
> in a front squat?
>
> >Pragmatically
> >free weight lifters like powerlifters and olympic lifters have a very
> >low chance of injury compared to other sports and they both squat a lot.
>
> Oh, so they DO get injured, just never when they're doing squats?
>
> >
>
> >Injury in the leg press often occurs from rounding the back at the
> >bottom or during a heavy session. There are so many safeguards in the
> >squat movement it is actually pretty safe.
>
> "pretty safe"! Now there's a reassuring phrase.
>
> > Knee health in olympic
> >weightlifters is very good and exceeds the general population according
> >to a study done in the 70's.
>
> Well, that's a cheery thought. To think that a bunch of dedicated
> athletes have better knees than the general population. Has it
> occurred to you that people with bad knees probably never get into
> weightlifting? Or that those who injure themselves while trying it out
> will probably stop pretty fast?
>
> A study in the 70's. I guess they figured - quit while you're ahead.
> And after all that time, it's probably impossible to check how well
> controlled the study was, let alone replicate it.
>
> I HAVE noticed quite a few world class lifters with pressure bandages
> on their knees. I guess that's to remind them that there's no chance
> of injury?
> >
Sarcasm aside, any athlete has a chance of injury. But if squatting was
inherently unsafe you'd see this population with a high amount of injury
- instead they have a much lower chance of injury than virtually any
other sport.
You do see belts and neoprene sleeves on some lifters. They are not
pressure bandages on olympic weightlifters - that is very, very rare
since it would interfere with the drop under the bar. The neoprene
serves to keep the knee warm more than anything else.
At best any movement is 'pretty safe'. People get hurt tieing their
shoes up. My point is simply that the free weight squat is a safer
movement than the leg press. Do what you want with your money.
--
Keith >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 22, 2007 Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 89) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hobbes wrote:
> Sarcasm aside, any athlete has a chance of injury. But if squatting was
> inherently unsafe you'd see this population with a high amount of injury
> - instead they have a much lower chance of injury than virtually any
> other sport.
You're wasting your time on a troll (or a complete imbecile). >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 28, 2005 Posts: 702
|
(Msg. 90) Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Bowflex shatters under load [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <3JmdnWvFXfmLwpjbnZ2dnUVZ_sfinZ2d RemoveThis @insightbb.com>,
223rem <223rem RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> Hobbes wrote:
>
> > Sarcasm aside, any athlete has a chance of injury. But if squatting was
> > inherently unsafe you'd see this population with a high amount of injury
> > - instead they have a much lower chance of injury than virtually any
> > other sport.
>
> You're wasting your time on a troll (or a complete imbecile).
Possibly. The jury is deliberating even as we speak.
:^)
--
Keith >> Stay informed about: Bowflex shatters under load |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|