Gun books recommendations

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:07:46 -0000, "Bully"
<bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:

>In news:YeRrh.27699$FY2.1180@bignews1.bellsouth.net,
>Edna Pearl <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> typed:
>> "Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>> news:51a4amF1jforjU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> In news:snkvq2ddfl8tej99al4qtbl16dje8obqt2@4ax.com,
>>> Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> typed:
>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>>>>> <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And even when the
>>>>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear
>>>>>> of interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you
>>>>>> thank you thank you.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>>>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>>>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a
>>>>> silly little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>>>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>>>>
>>>> So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
>>>> What did you say your proportions where?
>>>
>>> Leave it Shute! He's at least 30 years older than you AND he has
>>> smaller arms than you!
>>
>> But he knows a lot about apostrophes! And he has strong feelings
>> about them!
>>
>> ep
>
>Yes, those and small furry rodents.

If you smell a rat Bully boy it's because your nose is too near your
arse?

It's not difficult to get you to break cover from those so-called
"killfiles", is it Neil? You see, even though you may be working hard
at trying not to me respond directly, you are still allowing yourself
to be manipulated!!

You have much to learn my plump little friend!! ;o)
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, David Cohen wrote:

> "Tom Anderson" <twic.DeleteThis@urchin.earth.li> wrote
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, David Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> Or the superiority of country singing women.
>>
>> Cohen, i appreciate that you're completely insane, but seriously: what?
>
> http://www.sihope.com/~terryb/shania17.jpg
> http://mcbride.isuisse.com/images/martinawall15.jpg
> http://www.blinkyou.com/wp_celeb/f/faith-hill/images/007.jpg
> http://www.zipperfish.com/hottie/leann-rimes/wp-leann-rimes2-1024.jpg

One might equally argue for the superiority of manufactured pop singing
women:

http://www.hollywood-celebrity-pictures.com/Celebrities/Girls-Aloud/Gi...-Aloud-
http://www.ilbaluardo.com/Cover/Audio/0-9%20-%20A%20-%20B/ALL%20SAINTS...-%20All
http://www.new-dream.de/image/wallpaper/musik/atomic-kitten/atomic-kitten-05.jpg

Or are your country women also crack pistol shots as well or something?

tom

--
I have been spraying crisps out of my mouth in excitement for
five minutes now! I just keep shovelling them in and spraying them
out! Awesome! AWESOME! -- D
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

In article <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701181908590.27398.RemoveThis@urchin.earth.li>,
Tom Anderson <twic.RemoveThis@urchin.earth.li> wrote:

> http://www.new-dream.de/image/wallpaper/musik/atomic-kitten/atomic-kitten-05.j
> pg
>
> Or are your country women also crack pistol shots as well or something?
>
> tom

I dunno... Those are a bit scrawny.
While true female bodybuilders might be "overkill", a proper amount of
muscle on a woman is a lot more attractive than anorexics.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

In news:Pine.LNX.4.62.0701181908590.27398@urchin.earth.li,
Tom Anderson <twic RemoveThis @urchin.earth.li> typed:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, David Cohen wrote:
>
>> "Tom Anderson" <twic RemoveThis @urchin.earth.li> wrote
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, David Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or the superiority of country singing women.
>>>
>>> Cohen, i appreciate that you're completely insane, but seriously:
>>> what?
>>
>> http://www.sihope.com/~terryb/shania17.jpg
>> http://mcbride.isuisse.com/images/martinawall15.jpg
>> http://www.blinkyou.com/wp_celeb/f/faith-hill/images/007.jpg
>> http://www.zipperfish.com/hottie/leann-rimes/wp-leann-rimes2-1024.jpg
>
> One might equally argue for the superiority of manufactured pop
> singing women:
>
> http://www.hollywood-celebrity-pictures.com/Celebrities/Girls-Aloud/Gi...-Aloud-

Sorry about the ginger one guys...

> http://www.ilbaluardo.com/Cover/Audio/0-9%20-%20A%20-%20B/ALL%20SAINTS...-%20All
> http://www.new-dream.de/image/wallpaper/musik/atomic-kitten/atomic-kitten-05.jpg
>
> Or are your country women also crack pistol shots as well or
> something?
> tom



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:56:42 -0500, Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:41:06 -0000, "Bully"
><bully19 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>
>>In news:snkvq2ddfl8tej99al4qtbl16dje8obqt2@4ax.com,
>>Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> typed:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh RemoveThis @msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>>>> <edna_pearl RemoveThis @yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Bully" <bully19 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And even when the
>>>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>>>
>>>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>>>> interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank
>>>>> you thank you.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>>>
>>>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>>>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>>>
>>> So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
>>> What did you say your proportions where?
>>
>>Leave it Shute! He's at least 30 years older than you AND he has smaller
>>arms than you!
>
>I figured I would give him the benefit of the doubt in case those
>pictures where old or deceiving.

They will not be as "old *or* deceiving" as the "pictures" we have yet
to see of your obviously impressive self.

And that should be 'were' not "where", as I pointed out in an earlier
post.

>I find it odd that someone of his
>size is calling me fragile and weak.
>

As I have no idea of your physical prowess or proportions, and have no
inclination to so do, I would point out that my perception of your
"fragility" is in the area of your mental capacity.

Your presentation is juvenile in the extreme, and you appear to have a
slow wit and no sense of humour.

I don't mean to be unkind, but if you are going to be defensive and
gratuitously rude, then the least you can expect is the truth by way
of return!

HTH!
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:08:17 -0500, Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:24:07 +0000, Charles <jrh RemoveThis @msn.com> wrote:
>
[...] Selective snip:

>None of us simpletons could possibly understand.

Now you're getting the hang of it Shute dear boy!
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

In news:gjkvq2tabl1dq55co3aevnp7ke79he2tdu@4ax.com,
Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> typed:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:57:02 -0000, "Bully"
> <bully19 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>
>> In news:s0drq295s1se0p0qcsju8nhb9uk5e0isp8@4ax.com,
>> Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> typed:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:27:57 +0000, Tom Anderson
>>> <twic RemoveThis @urchin.earth.li> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, J. Gleixner wrote:
>>>>> No, the specific topic is weights, as it pertains to fitness, in a
>>>>> general category of miscellaneous. In other words, the post should
>>>>> have some relation to weights/weight lifting, as it relates to
>>>>> fitness. The topic becomes more specific at each '.', left to
>>>>> right.
>>>>
>>>> Good god! You must be some sort of rocket scientist or something.
>>>> This stuff is way over my head.
>>>
>>> Not really that hard to understand. When you categorize something
>>> you are going to start with the most general topic and then work to
>>> something more specific. It certainly makes sense to me.
>>> Unfortunately the whole concept of Usenet is chaotic and doesn't fit
>>> in any world which makes sense. There are a few hierarchy groups
>>> which are still modified. The rest exist in total anarchy where
>>> anything goes.
>>
>> Shute, you obviously have a very blinkered or sanitised view of the
>> world at large.
>
> I never heard anarchy and chaos described that way before.

You stick to the computers boy, at least they don't answer back.

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

In news:snkvq2ddfl8tej99al4qtbl16dje8obqt2@4ax.com,
Shute <Shute DeleteThis @nowhere.com> typed:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh DeleteThis @msn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>> <edna_pearl DeleteThis @yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Bully" <bully19 DeleteThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>
>>>>> And even when the
>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>
>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>> interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank
>>> you thank you.)
>>>
>>
>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>
>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>
>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>
> So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
> What did you say your proportions where?

Leave it Shute! He's at least 30 years older than you AND he has smaller
arms than you!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

In news:YeRrh.27699$FY2.1180@bignews1.bellsouth.net,
Edna Pearl <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> typed:
> "Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
> news:51a4amF1jforjU1@mid.individual.net...
>> In news:snkvq2ddfl8tej99al4qtbl16dje8obqt2@4ax.com,
>> Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> typed:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>>>> <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And even when the
>>>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>>>
>>>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear
>>>>> of interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you
>>>>> thank you thank you.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>>>
>>>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a
>>>> silly little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>>>
>>> So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
>>> What did you say your proportions where?
>>
>> Leave it Shute! He's at least 30 years older than you AND he has
>> smaller arms than you!
>
> But he knows a lot about apostrophes! And he has strong feelings
> about them!
>
> ep

Yes, those and small furry rodents.

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations