 |
|
|
|
Related Topics:
| Lyle's books - anyone read? - Lyle is a pretty prolific writer, and I'm in reading one of his books. I'm not sure which one to start with though, he seems to have several that touch on my goals of overall fat loss and muscle As a female who has been pretty..
free books - If you are looking for the truth to soothe and please your self, just click on this link. 2) If you are looking for the secrt of the family just click on this link 3) If you are looking for solving any social problem you face, just click on..
best current weight lifting books - Hi! I've been lifting off and on for years, but have become more committed in the last six months or so. Right now I'm following the book by Frank Melfa that's helping me a lot. I'm following his basic advice and getting results like never before. But I.
Jay Cutler Mr. Olympia Autographed CEO Muscle Books - Hi, I have a couple of CEO Muscle books that have been by Jay Cutler after he won the Olympia. Just wondering if anyone out there would like to pick one up. Shoot me an email if you're
Does anybody supply powerlifting video files - I am looking for files of routines that can be Cheers
|
|
|
Next: Weight Training Video: Lyle's books - anyone read?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 593
|
(Msg. 46) Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:06:30 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
<edna_pearl DeleteThis @yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>"Charles" <jrh DeleteThis @msn.com> wrote in message
>news:hhusq293j1ghrmd4q8562maq8bdnflob38@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>> <edna_pearl DeleteThis @yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bully" <bully19 DeleteThis @proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>
>>>>> And even when the
>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where this guy
>>>>> was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic entertainment. I
>>>>> don't remember the name of the group but I guess it was on topic.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>
>>>(I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>>interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank you thank
>>>you.)
>>>
>>
>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>
>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>
>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>
>Somebody finally is ragging on me about a typo in one of my posts!
No Edna my dear, that's not a "typo", that's a typical and much used
grammatical error by people who are confused by the whole "its"
vis-à-vis "it's" conundrum. It's about as bad as the misuse of "lose"
and "loose", which is also much in evidence in this group.
>Thank god! I can relax now. It''''''''s like when you get a new car, you should
>just go ahead and take a hammer to it so you don't have to worry about
>scratching the finish any more. My grammatical accuracy has taken a nice
>ding, and now I can relax.
A valiant attempt at a sophisticated come-back Edna dear, but it fools
no-one who has a firm grasp of the English language and a thorough
knowledge of Usenet bullshitters! ;o)
>Thanks, Charles 
My pleasure my dear; I doubt you'll fall into the trap again!;o) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 593
|
(Msg. 47) Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:36:12 -0000, "Bully"
<bully19.TakeThisOut@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>In news:Elvrh.4388$FL5.2606@bignews3.bellsouth.net,
>Edna Pearl <edna_pearl.TakeThisOut@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> typed:
>> "Charles" <jrh.TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote in message
>> news:hhusq293j1ghrmd4q8562maq8bdnflob38@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>>> <edna_pearl.TakeThisOut@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Bully" <bully19.TakeThisOut@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>>
>>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And even when the
>>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>>
>>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>>> interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank
>>>> you thank you.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>>
>>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>>
>>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>>
>> Somebody
>
>Not a somebody, a nobody.
I take that as a compliment Bully boy, as we all know that "nobody" is
perfect!! ;o)
You make a better straight man feed than you do a comedian, so keep
them coming matey! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: 60
|
(Msg. 48) Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:rtlsq2d3sptu1ls29sln4av0iva1m3o49s@4ax.com,
Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> typed:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:47:29 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
> <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>
>> "Shute" <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:fijsq215k3i7h24dh6978trgr8elda0d24@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:52:16 +0000 (UTC), DZ
>>> <8641.DeleteThis@2893123070.1773512763.92.31626.29952> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>> Tom Anderson <twic.DeleteThis@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
>>>>>> J. Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>>> No, the specific topic is weights, as it pertains to fitness,
>>>>>>> in a general category of miscellaneous. In other words, the
>>>>>>> post should have some relation to weights/weight lifting, as it
>>>>>>> relates to fitness. The topic becomes more specific at each
>>>>>>> '.', left to right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good god! You must be some sort of rocket scientist or
>>>>>> something. This stuff is way over my head.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not really that hard to understand. When you categorize
>>>>> something you are going to start with the most general topic and
>>>>> then work to something more specific.
>>>>
>>>> It still sounds too complicated. Could you elaborate on that in
>>>> more detail?
>>>
>>> Your the last person I would expect to ask that so I can only
>>> suspect it a trick question. This isn't a very good group to use
>>> as an example. It is easiest to see in graphical form:
>>>
>>> misc
>>> |
>>> fitness
>>> |
>>> |
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> | | | | |
>>> aerobic misc walking weightlifting weights
>>>
>>> If you where to add say nautilus it would go into a subgroup of
>>> either weights or weightlifting. Other misc groups would be
>>> parallel to fitness but not connected with the fitness sub
>>> categories. So weights falls under fitness which in turn falls
>>> under misc. Does that make sense now? With groups like:
>>> alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.coby.hamster.ductape
>>
>> My god, it's actually on my server. I thought you were shitting me.
>>
>> ep
>> (well, let's go see what that's all about)
>
> Well be careful. Many people inhabit dead groups who don't want to
> be found.
Is Ronnie Biggs out there hiding in one of them? Or did he die? What about
Jim Morrison? Elvis?
> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
> And even when the
> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where this guy
> was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic entertainment. I
> don't remember the name of the group but I guess it was on topic.
Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: 60
|
(Msg. 49) Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:Elvrh.4388$FL5.2606@bignews3.bellsouth.net,
Edna Pearl <edna_pearl.RemoveThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> typed:
> "Charles" <jrh.RemoveThis@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:hhusq293j1ghrmd4q8562maq8bdnflob38@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>> <edna_pearl.RemoveThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Bully" <bully19.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>
>>>>> And even when the
>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>
>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>> interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank
>>> you thank you.)
>>>
>>
>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>
>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>
>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>
> Somebody
Not a somebody, a nobody.
> finally is ragging on me about a typo in one of my posts! Thank god! I
> can relax now. It''''''''s like when you get a new
> car, you should just go ahead and take a hammer to it so you don't
> have to worry about scratching the finish any more. My grammatical
> accuracy has taken a nice ding, and now I can relax. Thanks, Charles
>
> ep
> (who always allows otters to work in)
--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 02, 2007
Posts: 35
|
(Msg. 50) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:18 am
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bully" <bully19.TakeThisOut@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:
> Is Ronnie Biggs out there hiding in one of them? Or did he die? What about
> Jim Morrison? Elvis?
Jim Morrison came back here using the name "Robert Schuh."
>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
Eh... The *NONE* disturbing kind?
Remember, i am here to help.
>> And even when the
>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where this guy
>> was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic entertainment. I
>> don't remember the name of the group but I guess it was on topic.
> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
Fair statement, yes.
--
Pete, The New & Improved Version
"Take your own advice: killfile. I took your advice on that subject BTW.
Your turn dude" -- Will Brink
"Problem is, I still see his/their posts 'cause
you respond to them, and that throws the balance of the universe of" -- Will
Brink >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 02, 2006
Posts: 288
|
(Msg. 51) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Shute wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:51:33 +0000 (UTC), DZ
> <17424 RemoveThis @148619873.10909663.605.7508.16545> wrote:
>
>> Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> DZ wrote:
>>>> Shute <Shute RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>> Tom Anderson <twic RemoveThis @urchin.earth.li> wrote:
>>>>>> J. Gleixner wrote:
>>>>>>> No, the specific topic is weights, as it pertains to fitness, in a
>>>>>>> general category of miscellaneous. In other words, the post should
>>>>>>> have some relation to weights/weight lifting, as it relates to
>>>>>>> fitness. The topic becomes more specific at each '.', left to
>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good god! You must be some sort of rocket scientist or
>>>>>> something. This stuff is way over my head.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not really that hard to understand. When you categorize something
>>>>> you are going to start with the most general topic and then work to
>>>>> something more specific.
>>>>
>>>> It still sounds too complicated. Could you elaborate on that in more
>>>> detail?
>>>
>>> Your the last person I would expect to ask that so I can only suspect
>>> it a trick question. This isn't a very good group to use as an
>>> example. It is easiest to see in graphical form:
>>>
>>> misc
>>> |
>>> fitness
>>> |
>>> |
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> | | | | |
>>> aerobic misc walking weightlifting weights
>>>
>>> If you where to add say nautilus it would go into a subgroup of either
>>> weights or weightlifting. Other misc groups would be parallel to
>>> fitness but not connected with the fitness sub categories. So
>>> weights falls under fitness which in turn falls under misc. Does
>>> that make sense now?
>>
>> You're being a bit brief, perhaps you could go into detail.
>
> Now I know your pulling my leg.
You really are a perceptive chap, i must say!
tom
--
VTEC Just Kicked in, Yo!! >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 02, 2006
Posts: 288
|
(Msg. 52) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 548
|
(Msg. 53) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 548
|
(Msg. 54) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 55) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
news:51a4amF1jforjU1@mid.individual.net...
> In news:snkvq2ddfl8tej99al4qtbl16dje8obqt2@4ax.com,
> Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> typed:
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>>> <edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>>
>>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And even when the
>>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where
>>>>>> this guy was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic
>>>>>> entertainment. I don't remember the name of the group but I
>>>>>> guess it was on topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>>
>>>> (I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>>> interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank
>>>> you thank you.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>>
>>> Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>> endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>> appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>>> little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>>
>>> I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>> apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>>
>> So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
>> What did you say your proportions where?
>
> Leave it Shute! He's at least 30 years older than you AND he has smaller
> arms than you!
But he knows a lot about apostrophes! And he has strong feelings about
them!
ep >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 548
|
(Msg. 56) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 593
|
(Msg. 57) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:07:16 -0500, Shute <Shute.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Charles <jrh.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:29:22 -0600, "Edna Pearl"
>><edna_pearl.DeleteThis@yahoo.BiteMeSpammer.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bully" <bully19.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
>>[...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I remember years ago someone mentioning:
>>>>> alt.binaries.pictures.asparagus
>>>>> The group was full of disturbing kiddie porn.
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to what other type of kiddie porn?
>>>>
>>>>> And even when the
>>>>> topics are on target they can be disturbing. I saw one where this guy
>>>>> was posting pictures of young chickens for erotic entertainment. I
>>>>> don't remember the name of the group but I guess it was on topic.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so if it was ON TOPIC, we can only presume you were in a
>>>> chicken-shaggers newsgroup -- right?
>>>
>>>(I hesitate to even post my appreciation of this thread for fear of
>>>interrupting it's ever-increasing hilarity. But thank you thank you thank
>>>you.)
>>>
>>
>>You appear to be very easily pleased Edna dear.
>>
>>Of course your hero worship now means that we will probably have to
>>endure more of the Bully boy's banalities, as he whets his bullying
>>appetite on the smallest chap in the school playground, with a silly
>>little girl shrieking misguided approval.
>>
>>I thought you had more substance than that, but the inappropriate
>>apostrophe in "it's" [sic] probably speaks volumes.
>
>So you think I am the smallest chap in the school playground huh.
>What did you say your proportions where?
Think mental capacity as opposed to physicality. >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 241
|
(Msg. 58) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <45ad14ec$0$503$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "J. Gleixner"
<glex_no-spam.RemoveThis@qwest-spam-no.invalid> wrote:
> Omelet wrote:
> > David Cohen recommended this one sometime back:
>
> What does this have to do with fitness?
Nothing, what's your point? It's not fitness.fitness.weights, but
MISC.fitness weights. We like the misc part here. >> Stay informed about: Gun books recommendations |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 24, 2005
Posts: 1423
|
(Msg. 59) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 02, 2006
Posts: 377
|
(Msg. 60) Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Gun books recommendations [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
