 |
|
|
|
Next: newbie
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 46) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:55 am
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)
|
|
|
JMW wrote:
> "oregonchick" <not_here.DeleteThis@comcat.net> wrote:
> >
> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad.DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5r6lg.7410 >
> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back Time. He
> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National News
> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards 
> >
> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all the
> >regulars from circa 2004?
>
> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
> up here.
I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 1294
|
(Msg. 47) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:39 am
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:17:00 -0400, Dally <Dally.TakeThisOut@myself.com> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:
>JMW wrote:
>
>> Golly! You're so hip and chic, Wendy!
>
>That's Wendell to you, Big Boy.
>
>> Personally, I prefer the non-proprietary anarchy of Usenet. No guru
>> webmasters to worship or "moderators" to worry about contradicting.
>> No membership sign-ups. No retarded avatars, self-aggrandizing
>> profiles, or pompous enumerations of user postings. Usenet has become
>> the underground that newbie web dorks don't even know about and
>> stumble into largely by mistake, calling a newsgroup a "board," or
>> "list," or "room."
>>
>> Long live Usenet!
>
>Actually, I agree. It's too hard on Livejournal to wander across the
>unexpected. Instead of our model of a neighborhood bar model where
>anyone can walk in, Livejournal is more like a hotel where everyone is
>in their own private room and you gradually find out who is where when
>they come out to interact in a lobby or function room. Many, many, many
>rooms are locked and you can only get in if you know to ask. It does a
>lovely job of keeping out trolls, but an awful job of meeting new people.
>
How are you and Miss Brilliant getting along these days? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 1294
|
(Msg. 48) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:17:40 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra.RemoveThis@wanadoo.nl>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
>"Dally" <Dally.RemoveThis@myself.com> schreef:
>
>> But the real reason I suggested distinguishing names was for google users.
>> "Google Lyle" means something, whether you like Lyle or not.
>
>Googling with an E-mail adress works a lot better.
>
Or not. There are a number of posts with my email address that were
never made by me. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 49) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:41 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
JMW wrote:
> "geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >JMW wrote:
> >> "oregonchick" <not_here.TakeThisOut@comcat.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad.TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5r6lg.7410 >
> >> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back Time. He
> >> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National News
> >> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
> >> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
> >> >
> >> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all the
> >> >regulars from circa 2004?
> >>
> >> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
> >> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
> >> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
> >> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
> >> up here.
> >
> >I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>
> No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
> alone.
So sorry. I'll be sure to cc you on any future memos.
> So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
A combination. There simply wasn't enough entertainment value to make
up for the unpleasantness of the personal attacks.
> Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
> personality is truly a delight, and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
> backdrop for important communiques to The Admiral.
Why thank you, kind sir! <curtsey> >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 50) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dally wrote:
> geek_girl wrote:
>
> > I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>
> Heh. I didn't know you hung out HERE anymore, either.
>
> Dally
I don't hang out here on a regular basis anymore, but I stop by
occasionally to spread a little sunshine. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2005
Posts: 319
|
(Msg. 51) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:18 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
geek_girl wrote:
> JMW wrote:
> > "geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> > >JMW wrote:
> > >> "oregonchick" <not_here RemoveThis @comcat.net> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad RemoveThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5r6lg.7410 >
> > >> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back Time. He
> > >> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National News
> > >> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
> > >> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
> > >> >
> > >> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all the
> > >> >regulars from circa 2004?
> > >>
> > >> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
> > >> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
> > >> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
> > >> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
> > >> up here.
> > >
> > >I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
> >
> > No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
> > alone.
>
> So sorry. I'll be sure to cc you on any future memos.
>
> > So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
>
> A combination. There simply wasn't enough entertainment value to make
> up for the unpleasantness of the personal attacks.
Hmmm ... Interesting. Your reference to "the unpleasantness of the
personal attacks" somehow sounds more grievous than anything you
experienced in MFW. I won't be so crass as to ask the identity of the
offender[s], but would you disclose the forums in which those attacks
occurred? A morbid curiousity on my part, of course.
> > Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
> > personality is truly a delight, and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
> > backdrop for important communiques to The Admiral.
>
> Why thank you, kind sir! <curtsey>
Always happy to oblige a delicate flower such as yourself. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 52) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
David Cohen wrote:
> "JMW" <jmwilliams DeleteThis @enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote
> > "geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> >>JMW wrote:
> >>> "oregonchick" <not_here DeleteThis @comcat.net> wrote:
> >>> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
> >>> >news:5r6lg.7410 >
> >>> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back
> >>> >> Time. He
> >>> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National
> >>> >> News
> >>> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
> >>> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
> >>> >
> >>> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all
> >>> >the
> >>> >regulars from circa 2004?
> >>>
> >>> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
> >>> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
> >>> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
> >>> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
> >>> up here.
> >>
> >>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
> >
> > No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
> > alone.
> >
> > So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
> >
> > Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
> > personality
>
> !?! OK, now THAT'S a memo I missed
But you don't need a memo for that; you saw it firsthand!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/be24d4a0a64981ba?hl=en&
>
> > is truly a delight,
>
> Well, yes.
>
> > and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
> > backdrop
>
> That one I knew
Yep, you saw that one firsthand too. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 53) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dally wrote:
> geek_girl wrote:
>
> > Dally wrote:
> >
> >>geek_girl wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
> >>
> >>Heh. I didn't know you hung out HERE anymore, either.
> >>
> >>Dally
> >
> >
> > I don't hang out here on a regular basis anymore, but I stop by
> > occasionally to spread a little sunshine.
>
> So how did your cutting experiment go, anyway?
>
> Dally
I'm not sure you can call it "cutting" under those circumstances.
Anyway, the experiment went rather oddly. I gave up on that stupid diet
after my power went out for 15 hours and I had to throw away most of my
food. Then I started losing weight without trying. After I lost a few
pounds I realized that what I really needed to do was gain back some
muscle. I'm not doing that right now though. Bulking in summer is...
eww. I just can't eat that much when it's hot out. Not consistently,
anyway. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 15, 2006
Posts: 934
|
(Msg. 54) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:53 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>JMW wrote:
>> "oregonchick" <not_here.RemoveThis@comcat.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad.RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5r6lg.7410 >
>> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back Time. He
>> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National News
>> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
>> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
>> >
>> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all the
>> >regulars from circa 2004?
>>
>> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
>> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
>> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
>> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
>> up here.
>
>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
alone.
So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
personality is truly a delight, and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
backdrop for important communiques to The Admiral. >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 910
|
(Msg. 55) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:02 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John Hanson wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:17:00 -0400, Dally <Dally RemoveThis @myself.com> wrote in
> misc.fitness.weights:
>
> How are you and Miss Brilliant getting along these days?
She's a Meanyhead. We hate each other (but we hate everyone else more.)
Why do you ask?
Dally >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 910
|
(Msg. 56) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:05 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 11, 2005
Posts: 599
|
(Msg. 57) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:47 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"geek_girl" wrote
>
> Dally wrote:
>> geek_girl wrote:
>>
>> > I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>>
>> Heh. I didn't know you hung out HERE anymore, either.
>>
>> Dally
>
> I don't hang out here on a regular basis anymore, but I stop by
> occasionally to spread a little sunshine.
>
<basking in the rays> >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 910
|
(Msg. 58) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:33 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
geek_girl wrote:
> Dally wrote:
>
>>geek_girl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>>
>>Heh. I didn't know you hung out HERE anymore, either.
>>
>>Dally
>
>
> I don't hang out here on a regular basis anymore, but I stop by
> occasionally to spread a little sunshine.
So how did your cutting experiment go, anyway?
Dally >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 24, 2005
Posts: 1423
|
(Msg. 59) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:11 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"JMW" <jmwilliams DeleteThis @enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote
> "geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>JMW wrote:
>>> "oregonchick" <not_here DeleteThis @comcat.net> wrote:
>>> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>> >news:5r6lg.7410 >
>>> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back
>>> >> Time. He
>>> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National
>>> >> News
>>> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
>>> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
>>> >
>>> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all
>>> >the
>>> >regulars from circa 2004?
>>>
>>> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
>>> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
>>> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
>>> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
>>> up here.
>>
>>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>
> No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
> alone.
>
> So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
>
> Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
> personality
!?! OK, now THAT'S a memo I missed
> is truly a delight,
Well, yes.
> and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
> backdrop
That one I knew
David >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 593
|
(Msg. 60) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:54 pm
Post subject: Re: newbie group question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:53:23 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams.TakeThisOut@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>"geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>JMW wrote:
>>> "oregonchick" <not_here.TakeThisOut@comcat.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >"David Cohen" <sammiesdad.TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5r6lg.7410 >
>>> >> We used to have a regular poster here named Lyle. In the Way Back Time. He
>>> >> has not, at least, joined the "Former MFW Regulars That Make National News
>>> >> And Go To Prison" Club. It was, to say the least, a more...uh,
>>> >> interesting...group back then. I won't hold you to those standards
>>> >
>>> >Geesh! I've noticed that too. What the hell happened? WHere are all the
>>> >regulars from circa 2004?
>>>
>>> 2004? Many of the regulars had already left by then. Lyle now
>>> presides as guru over his own ashram, and some of his loyal followers
>>> post there. Being female, you may be thinking of Nina and Sarah Jane;
>>> yes, that's where they hang out, although Sarah Jane occasionally pops
>>> up here.
>>
>>I don't hang out there anymore. Didn't you get the memo?
>
>No. I must have been removed from the circulation loop. I feel so
>alone.
>
>So, was your departure due to personal conflicts or boredom?
>
>Keep in mind that you're always welcome here. Your shy and gentle
>personality is truly a delight, and your ample bosom forms a wonderful
>backdrop for important communiques to The Admiral.
I see you clutch at straws as usual Williams, in your desperation to
get one over on me. Remember that .jpeg is only on my web site because
I want it there; and because I have the capacity to enjoy a joke -
even if it is at my own expense.
By way of retaliation for your silliness John Williams, and given that
you are indicating a predilection for all things anal, I raise a cheek
and fart raucously in your general direction, as a token of my regard
for you! >> Stay informed about: newbie group question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | My beginner workout routine good? - I started lifting weights about a month ago, and I have asked for advice from my friends and I wanted to know if what I am doing is correct. A typical week at the gym looks like this: (a rep about equal to 10 tries) Monday: 10 min run to warm up, 3....
Question for old newbie - Age 52, M, 5'11, lifelong narrow shoulders, slightly wide hips. Just dropped 40 pounds to 175 on docs orders (eat most veggie, fish maybe three times a week.) Looking thin, but I am already losing muscle mass, I can tell, and sure enough when I went to..
Newbie fitness/protein shake question - Sorry if this is the wrong forum to post this. I'm a 37 year old male, 5' 10" and about 200lbs...I'm a life long couch potato with pretty much no muscle. Been using free weights and the treadmill for the past 2 weeks...alternating days with one da...
Newbie - Hi I have just joined a gym for first time in my life. I am male, 21, 5ft 7 and underweight at just 9 stone 8lbs. I am "slim". I have been advised that my best bet for increasing size is to use the weights and then use something like swimm...
Advice needed - newbie - Hello everyone I was just after a little advice really, there seems to be so much on the web, but I figured it would be better getting info from the horses mouth, so to speak. :) I'd like to develop my upper body somewhat, I'm fairly slim at the moment... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
