The value of deadlifts

On 1 Mar 2005 06:15:06 -0800, nsteel.DeleteThis@rabbit.com.au (Nicholas Steel)
wrote:

>> >
>> >> David <forgotwhy.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The people that respond in that tone and manner are basically showing
>> >> > off to their friends. If it were just you asking the question with no
>> >> > gallery to perform for, the reply would be honest and helpful. People
>> >> > here have a narrow range of knowledge and love to be arrogant when
>> >> > they get an opportunity. This was a genuine question and deserves a
>> >> > genuine reply.
>> >>
>> >> It's only been asked a zillion times. Google has plenty of "replies".
>> >
>> >Well, then maybe we don't even need a newsgroup. You can just google
>> >whatever information you need on lifting, training, nutrition, etc. It's
>> >all on the web somewhere.
>>
>> Basically, that is true.
>>
>Not quite. Some questions are very specific and dont lend themselves
>to easy searching.
>
>> >I don't understand the offense people take at questions that have been
>> >asked before.
>>
>It's not the repitition of the question that causes offense - its
>something deeper. People enjoy picking on others and any excuse will
>do, especially in a forum where anonymity is assured. Do a google
>search on terms like "sociology" and "outgroup sanctions" and you can
>see that people are basically malignant and enjoy looking down on
>others. This particular bitch is displaying familar patterns.

Which is what I have been saying for a number of yeas!!

>
>> Because it gets old, real old. Especially when the information exists
>> ad nauseum.
>> Reread his post and think about the question.
>>
>> > If you don't want to answer, you don't have to. And if you
>> >don't want to read it, you probably can judge from the subject that you
>> >don't want to.
>>
>> Yup, I should have just deleted it and not posted a reply, but the
>> prevalence in lack of thinking and stupidity irritates me lately.
>
>Lack of thinking? Stupidity? The glove doesnt fit. My original post
>involves subject matter that is not self evident. Interestingly, no
>one has answered the qustion although one individual did use some
>impressive words. In addition there was no evidence of a lack of
>erudition.

I have been batting quite consistently on your behalf, and a number of
others have also been supportive, so don't write us all off just
because of a couple of idiotic pseudo egocentrics!!

>
>
>> Especially when I have to work on a sunny Sunday and haven't had my
>> coffee yet.
>>
>> But then I can be a real bitch sometimes and that's how I am
>> sometimes.
>
>In other words you're not happy with your lot. Thats no suprise. Im
>amazed at the number of traps modern social engineers have laid out
>for contemporary women such as you. It seems inevitable they stumble
>from one counter instinctive mess to another - seek a career, world
>travel, puppy dog instead of motherhood etc etc
>
> If y'all can't handle it, you can killfile me or not read
>> my posts. Matters not to me.
>>
>Even the worst men hate cold indifference in a woman.Got a husband?
>I'm laying odds you dont and that explains some of your hostility.

You are almost spot on, but she is a mother, for whatever that's
worth. She is far too confused and up her own arse to be good at
relationships!!

"Nicholas Steel" <nsteel DeleteThis @rabbit.com.au> wrote in message
news:e5cbdf32.0503010615.2a58199@posting.google.com...
> > >
> > >> David <forgotwhy DeleteThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >> > The people that respond in that tone and manner are basically
showing
> > >> > off to their friends. If it were just you asking the question with
no
> > >> > gallery to perform for, the reply would be honest and helpful.
People
> > >> > here have a narrow range of knowledge and love to be arrogant when
> > >> > they get an opportunity. This was a genuine question and deserves a
> > >> > genuine reply.
> > >>
> > >> It's only been asked a zillion times. Google has plenty of
"replies".
> > >
> > >Well, then maybe we don't even need a newsgroup. You can just google
> > >whatever information you need on lifting, training, nutrition, etc.
It's
> > >all on the web somewhere.
> >
> > Basically, that is true.
> >
> Not quite. Some questions are very specific and dont lend themselves
> to easy searching.
>
> > >I don't understand the offense people take at questions that have been
> > >asked before.
> >
> It's not the repitition of the question that causes offense - its
> something deeper. People enjoy picking on others and any excuse will
> do, especially in a forum where anonymity is assured. Do a google
> search on terms like "sociology" and "outgroup sanctions" and you can
> see that people are basically malignant and enjoy looking down on
> others. This particular bitch is displaying familar patterns.
>
> > Because it gets old, real old. Especially when the information exists
> > ad nauseum.
> > Reread his post and think about the question.
> >
> > > If you don't want to answer, you don't have to. And if you
> > >don't want to read it, you probably can judge from the subject that you
> > >don't want to.
> >
> > Yup, I should have just deleted it and not posted a reply, but the
> > prevalence in lack of thinking and stupidity irritates me lately.
>
> Lack of thinking? Stupidity? The glove doesnt fit. My original post
> involves subject matter that is not self evident. Interestingly, no
> one has answered the qustion although one individual did use some
> impressive words. In addition there was no evidence of a lack of
> erudition.

[....}

you're question was answered at least a couple of times - there is a range
of motion for several muscle groups - so that is obvious that those muscles
are being worked - like traps, back, legs, glutes, hams etc - where is your
difficulty?