Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air..

Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to
ATC. There is more to the story. Some theories are a bit in left
field but look at OKC bombing- federal agents conveniently stayed
home.

On Sep 13, 3:14 pm, EskWI... RemoveThis @spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> In misc.survivalism aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgd... RemoveThis @googlemail.com wrote:
> > Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> > witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
> > "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the
> passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret
> hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring
> all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted
> to secret landing sites?
>
> Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not
> the AA planes.
>
> I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
> demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
> that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.
>
> First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their
> passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced.
>
> --
> The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
> certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
> -- Bertrand Russel
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

On Sep 13, 8:14 pm, EskWI... DeleteThis @spamblock.panix.com wrote:

> I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
> demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
> that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3447/wtcliftshaftsut3.jpg

Mechanical Engineer explains how demolitions charges were place on the
welded joints on the WTC beams that ran up the center of the towers.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4801566025292753615
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

On Sep 13, 7:13 pm, Not Disclosed <nos....DeleteThis@invalid.not> wrote:
> aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgd....DeleteThis@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> > witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
>
> > "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> > "It was a military plane"
>
> > "It was definitely no airliner"
>
> > Watch:
> >http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY
>
> Hmmmm, why would people on the ground at the time of the crashes say;
>
> "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> Because some k00k remastered the video, the aicraft was definately a
> Boeing 757.


If you think about it, perhaps the stupidest thing about this alleged
video, is people supposidly running around right as the planes are
hitting the WTC towers saying "That was no American Airlines jet"
At that point in time, as it was happening, no one had said it was an
American Airlines jet, a United jet, a commericial jet or anything
else. People on the street would not know the airlines involved
until much later.
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

<aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgdgdf.DeleteThis@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
>
> "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> "It was a military plane"
>
> "It was definitely no airliner"
>
> Watch:
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY

People on the ground had no better view of the air planes than people
with cameras on the ground:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=2lOcEOsmAtA
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

On Sep 13, 11:56 am, aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgd... RemoveThis @googlemail.com wrote:
> Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
>
> "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> "It was a military plane"
>
> "It was definitely no airliner"
>
> Watch:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY

With the multiple plays of the live video shot _showing_ the planes
hitting the towers, idiots still try to pull that worn out, debunked,
idiotic, crazy horseshit. Those videos clearly show planes well
enough for identification as to type if not specific models.

Harry K
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgdgdf.TakeThisOut@googlemail.com wrote:
> Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
>
> "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> "It was a military plane"
>
> "It was definitely no airliner"
>
> Watch:
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY
>

Hmmmm, why would people on the ground at the time of the crashes say;

"That was no American Airlines jet"

Because some k00k remastered the video, the aicraft was definately a
Boeing 757.
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

In misc.survivalism aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgdgdf.RemoveThis@googlemail.com wrote:
> Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

> "That was no American Airlines jet"

If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the
passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret
hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring
all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted
to secret landing sites?

Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not
the AA planes.

I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.

First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their
passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced.

--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

EskWIRED.TakeThisOut@spamblock.panix.com wrote in
news:fcc27d$qvp$3@reader1.panix.com:


> First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and
> their passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced.


How can a government that can't co-ordinate relief efforts after a
hurricane co-ordinate what would be the biggest conspiracy of all time?

They can't thats how.
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

In article <fcc27d$qvp$3@reader1.panix.com>,
<EskWIRED.TakeThisOut@spamblock.panix.com> wrote:

> If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the
> passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret
> hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring
> all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted
> to secret landing sites?
>
> Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not
> the AA planes.
>
> I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
> demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
> that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.
>
> First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their
> passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced.

These conspiracy kooks need their tinfoil adjusted.
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

<trader4 RemoveThis @optonline.net> wrote

> Oh, and then what about this fellow Bin Laden and his cohorts
> releasing videos where they take credit for 911? Is he part of the
> conspiracy too? LOL

Yeah, like the US government would ever have Bin Laden in bed with them.
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

SGT. Major wrote:
> <trader4 RemoveThis @optonline.net> wrote
>
>> Oh, and then what about this fellow Bin Laden and his cohorts
>> releasing videos where they take credit for 911? Is he part of the
>> conspiracy too? LOL
>
> Yeah, like the US government would ever have Bin Laden in bed with them.

Didn't he have some connection to receive support from the CIA to fight
the Soviets in Afghanistan?

Jeff
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

trader4 DeleteThis @optonline.net wrote:
> On Sep 13, 5:05 pm, big... DeleteThis @backpacker.com wrote:
>> Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to
>> ATC. There is more to the story.
>
> Yes, there is more to the story if you cared to check facts BEFORE
> trying to start more nonsense based on misinformation. Yes, the
> hijackers turned off the transponders. But no, that doesn't make the
> aircraft invisible to ATC radar. The transponder only provides a
> better radar return signal and info from the plane on it's altitude,
> airspeed, heading, etc. ATC still had radar images of the planes.
> They've even been shown occasionally on TV. A 757 is no more
> invisible to radar than a B-52. Wasn't that the whole point of the
> billions spent on new stealth military aircraft?
>
The transponders main function is to provide a data block for ATC as
trader4 says. Stealth aircraft will mount radar reflectors so they can
be seen while on training flights in the USA
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air.. 

In article <fcc27d$qvp$3@reader1.panix.com>, EskWIRED.DeleteThis@spamblock.panix.com
says...
> In misc.survivalism aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgdgdf.DeleteThis@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
> > witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
>
> > "That was no American Airlines jet"
>
> If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the
> passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret
> hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring
> all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted
> to secret landing sites?
>
> Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not
> the AA planes.
>
> I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
> demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
> that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.
>
> First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their
> passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced.
>
>

Exactly, how do you hide the Attorney General's wife Barbara Olson?
 >> Stay informed about: Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial air..