In article , Scott
Eiler wrote:
> Thanks for the info. It makes me think, maybe Usenet *can* be a fitness
> disseminator.
We've been working on that idea in this newsgroup for ten years now!
> > ACE and AFAA still recommend no more than 128 bpm as the highest BPM,
> > for healthy people in an advanced class.
>
> Now, if only those long-time instructors could tap into this modern
> fitness information...
Tongue planted firmly in cheek, I detect....
> Yeah, I have to do that too. But they don't make me recertify what I
> already learned from them, they just make me go to workshops or take
> mail-in courses, on things just barely related to what I certified for.
> In my own case, I used my mail-in knowledge of, among other things,
> "Teenage Girls and Osteoporosis" for recertification.
Yes, it's unfortunate that it works this way. OTOH, certification is
intended as the beginning of one's fitness education rather than the
end, so it's good that they encourage us to keep learning.
> How much more in
> violation will I be after twenty years? How much more so, if I would
> not listen to other fitness professionals?
None, if you keep up on fitness trends and research. ACE's "Fitness
Matters" newsletter is actually pretty decent for this purpose. Much
better publication than AFAA's "American Fitness", which is pretty
fluffy.
> Unfortunately, I verbally tried this already. His response was, among
> other things, "If I've been doing this wrong, I've been doing this wrong
> for twenty years." His point being...?
There are some pretty big egos in the fitness industry, and trying to
tell these people anything is like talking to a brick wall.
My own personal crusade has been against supersonic step tempos and the
reverse turn as a step move.
The reverse turn is contraindicated (AFAA will fail anyone who uses a
contraindicated move during the practical portion of step specialty
certification exam.) I have thrown up my hand right in the middle of
presentations to demand an alternative for the reverse turn. "Just do
a regular turn" doesn't cut it, because that expects you to start out
facing a different direction and ends one up facing the wrong
direction. Most of the time I get the reaction "well it's an advanced
move, but my participants are advanced so they can do it just fine."
BS, it has nothing to do with _whether_ they can do it, it has
everything to do with the unnatural biomechanical demands of the move
no matter who's doing it.
I get upset when I attend fitness conferences where nationally-known
presenters use reverse turns and step music at 135+ BPM. (With a
digital metronome I have clocked presenters as high as 141 BPM!) These
people are supposed to know better and lead by example. Folks who
attend these conferences are earning CECs, so they come away with the
impression that the certifying organizations are saying it's okay to do
these things. Nothing could be further from the truth, but ACE and
AFAA can't monitor every presenter at every conference. A few years
ago after I wrote to ACE two years in a row about specific "violations"
by presenters at particular conference, they sent a representative to
spot-check the next one.
> If I give this guy a copy of fitness guidelines, with relevent points
> highlighted, he'll probably go postal. And this guy runs my gym, so he
> can expel me altogether.
Is he that much of a loose cannon? This isn't the kind of person who
should be running a corporate fitness center! I suggest that if he
were to do either of these, it should be immediately brought to his
manager's attention. Perhaps you should have your conversation in a
public-enough spot where there are sure to be witnesses.
> In short... maybe I can't get much constructive advice here, but at
> least I can vent.
I feel for ya.
--
Denise denise dot howard at comcast dot net
ACE and AFAA certified fitness instructor
AFAA step and kickboxing certified
>> Stay informed about: Standards and Sloppage and Long-Time Instructors