fatness trainer wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. So how does one determine exactly
> the best MHR for best cardio?
I think you asking about %MHR, not MHR. The short answer
is: there is no such thing as "best %MHR", contrary to
popularized terminology designed to motivate people.
> Is it as basic as "the more you sweat"?
Generally, no.
> I maintain a constant heart-rate between about 165-172
> for 45 minutes.
Those numbers are not meaningful without knowing your MHR.
And by "MHR", I do not mean the estimate "age - 220",
although that is a starting point.
Also, what is "best" for cardio development is variable,
not constant HR. The best program for "interval training"
depends on the individual. But to give some idea, I
mean alternative intervals of a few minutes at 85-90%
(pushing your lactate threshold) and several-to-many
minutes at 75-85%. But that presumes that you are already
at an intermediate fitness level or better and in good
medical condition.
This is all predicated on knowing your MHR. I do not
recommend expensive and risky maximal stress tests,
unless you are a serious competitive athlete. I believe
you can estimate your MHR fairly well with your own ad
hoc submaximal test.
> It seems the point at which I can maintain it without
> too much problem and I feel comfortable but am sweating
> profusely...Good, bad, ?
Sounds like you might be under-exerting yourself. When
you are done with a "good workout", you should feel spent,
but you could go on for another 20 min if you wanted to.
The talk test is a better indicator than amount of sweat.
Google "rate of perceived exertion test". For one example,
see
http://www.ginmiller.com/gmf04/artinfo/THR4rpetalktest.htm .
I do not agree with the specifics on that web page. But
it should give you some idea of what I am talking about.
Some people rely entirely on perceived exertion, eschewing
physical measurements such as %MHR. I prefer to use both.
I use perceived exertion to calibrate my HRM. Then I
mostly rely on the HRM because perceived exertion is
highly sensitive to psychological factors. But I still
listen to my body because HR can be misleading occassionally
(changes in stress, medication, extreme weather, etc).
>> Stay informed about: Polar F11 fitness trainer...anyone have ones? thoughts?