Welcome to TheFitnessForum.net!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

NY Barbell's New Kettlebell

 
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Lifting Equipment RSS
Next:  Weird variant of a smith machine  
Author Message
ATP*

External


Since: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 157



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:55 am
Post subject: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)

http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/im-0350wh.html

They are switching over to a wider handled, more traditional looking
kettlebell. I picked up a 35 pounder yesterday. Workmanship and casting is
OK. I don't have any Pavlov kettlebells to compare to, these were supposedly
designed by Chinese masters.....

 >> Stay informed about: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2036



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:30 am
Post subject: Re: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"ATP*" <eugene RemoveThis @ogedin.com> wrote in message
news:Tydcf.8065$oP5.4146@fe09.lga...
> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/im-0350wh.html
>
> They are switching over to a wider handled, more traditional looking
> kettlebell. I picked up a 35 pounder yesterday. Workmanship and
> casting is OK. I don't have any Pavlov kettlebells to compare to,
> these were supposedly designed by Chinese masters.....

Their first offering, pictured on the left here:

http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/kettlebells.html

was less than satisfactory for most things.

The flat top to the handle and the corner at the ends of it still isn't
great. See the difference?

http://www.dragondoor.com/images/thumbnails/p10.jpg

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

 >> Stay informed about: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell 
Back to top
Login to vote
ATP*

External


Since: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 157



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:26 am
Post subject: Re: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Steve Freides" <steve.DeleteThis@fridayscomputer.com> wrote in message
news:3td8rcFrmcvqU1@individual.net...
> "ATP*" <eugene.DeleteThis@ogedin.com> wrote in message
> news:Tydcf.8065$oP5.4146@fe09.lga...
>> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/im-0350wh.html
>>
>> They are switching over to a wider handled, more traditional looking
>> kettlebell. I picked up a 35 pounder yesterday. Workmanship and casting
>> is OK. I don't have any Pavlov kettlebells to compare to, these were
>> supposedly designed by Chinese masters.....
>
> Their first offering, pictured on the left here:
>
> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/kettlebells.html
>
> was less than satisfactory for most things.
>
> The flat top to the handle and the corner at the ends of it still isn't
> great. See the difference?
>
> http://www.dragondoor.com/images/thumbnails/p10.jpg
>
> -S-
> http://www.kbnj.com
>
I see the difference, but is it really significant?
 >> Stay informed about: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2036



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:36 pm
Post subject: Re: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"ATP*" <eugene DeleteThis @ogedin.com> wrote in message
news:%1lcf.68001$rE2.18053@fe10.lga...
>
> "Steve Freides" <steve DeleteThis @fridayscomputer.com> wrote in message
> news:3td8rcFrmcvqU1@individual.net...
>> "ATP*" <eugene DeleteThis @ogedin.com> wrote in message
>> news:Tydcf.8065$oP5.4146@fe09.lga...
>>> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/im-0350wh.html
>>>
>>> They are switching over to a wider handled, more traditional looking
>>> kettlebell. I picked up a 35 pounder yesterday. Workmanship and
>>> casting is OK. I don't have any Pavlov kettlebells to compare to,
>>> these were supposedly designed by Chinese masters.....
>>
>> Their first offering, pictured on the left here:
>>
>> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/kettlebells.html
>>
>> was less than satisfactory for most things.
>>
>> The flat top to the handle and the corner at the ends of it still
>> isn't great. See the difference?
>>
>> http://www.dragondoor.com/images/thumbnails/p10.jpg
>>
>> -S-
>> http://www.kbnj.com
>>
> I see the difference, but is it really significant?

It depends. We had an interesting discussion on Bryce Lane's board
about different kettlebell handles. There's a handle-only product
called the Kettlestack that you load your own plates onto. For the life
of me, I could not figure out a way to snatch the thing right-handed
without the edge of a plate landing on a bone in my forearm. This is
not an issue for people new to the Kettlestack - they either figure out
a way to use what they've got, give up entirely, or whatever else, but
I've been doing this for a few years and have my own "groove" for the
movement. It was interesting but not altogether unexpected that the
groove I had left-handed was different than the one I had right-handed.
I could use the handle-based kettlebell left-handed for snatches without
much problem although I still didn't find them as comfortable as with
the kettlebells I was used to.

So there are things like that with the difference in handle between the
two kinds of kettlebells we're talking about as well - it only matters
if it matters to you. I tend to slide into the rounded area of the
handle pretty quickly when doing high-rep snatches and I think it would
matter to me, although I don't think I'd mind it nearly as much as the
sort of problems I describe above with the plate-loaded handle.

Bottom line - for swings, just about anything should work. For
movements in which the bell flips around like cleans and snatches, the
handle shape becomes pretty important. For movements in which the
handle flips once then stays there, e.g., jerks or presses, probably
somewhere in between in terms of importance. If you look here, for
instance:

http://www.kettlebell.co.uk

you'll see the same rounding at the edges of the handle. I've used
these and _really_ like them, and if I was in the UK, I'd get them
instead of DragonDoor kettlebells because they're less expensive.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com
 >> Stay informed about: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell 
Back to top
Login to vote
ATP*

External


Since: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 157



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Steve Freides" <steve.TakeThisOut@fridayscomputer.com> wrote in message
news:3tefqmFs9467U1@individual.net...
> "ATP*" <eugene.TakeThisOut@ogedin.com> wrote in message
> news:%1lcf.68001$rE2.18053@fe10.lga...
>>
>> "Steve Freides" <steve.TakeThisOut@fridayscomputer.com> wrote in message
>> news:3td8rcFrmcvqU1@individual.net...
>>> "ATP*" <eugene.TakeThisOut@ogedin.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Tydcf.8065$oP5.4146@fe09.lga...
>>>> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/im-0350wh.html
>>>>
>>>> They are switching over to a wider handled, more traditional looking
>>>> kettlebell. I picked up a 35 pounder yesterday. Workmanship and casting
>>>> is OK. I don't have any Pavlov kettlebells to compare to, these were
>>>> supposedly designed by Chinese masters.....
>>>
>>> Their first offering, pictured on the left here:
>>>
>>> http://www.newyorkbarbells.tv/kettlebells.html
>>>
>>> was less than satisfactory for most things.
>>>
>>> The flat top to the handle and the corner at the ends of it still isn't
>>> great. See the difference?
>>>
>>> http://www.dragondoor.com/images/thumbnails/p10.jpg
>>>
>>> -S-
>>> http://www.kbnj.com
>>>
>> I see the difference, but is it really significant?
>
> It depends. We had an interesting discussion on Bryce Lane's board about
> different kettlebell handles. There's a handle-only product called the
> Kettlestack that you load your own plates onto. For the life of me, I
> could not figure out a way to snatch the thing right-handed without the
> edge of a plate landing on a bone in my forearm. This is not an issue for
> people new to the Kettlestack - they either figure out a way to use what
> they've got, give up entirely, or whatever else, but I've been doing this
> for a few years and have my own "groove" for the movement. It was
> interesting but not altogether unexpected that the groove I had
> left-handed was different than the one I had right-handed. I could use the
> handle-based kettlebell left-handed for snatches without much problem
> although I still didn't find them as comfortable as with the kettlebells I
> was used to.
>
> So there are things like that with the difference in handle between the
> two kinds of kettlebells we're talking about as well - it only matters if
> it matters to you. I tend to slide into the rounded area of the handle
> pretty quickly when doing high-rep snatches and I think it would matter to
> me, although I don't think I'd mind it nearly as much as the sort of
> problems I describe above with the plate-loaded handle.
>
> Bottom line - for swings, just about anything should work. For movements
> in which the bell flips around like cleans and snatches, the handle shape
> becomes pretty important. For movements in which the handle flips once
> then stays there, e.g., jerks or presses, probably somewhere in between in
> terms of importance. If you look here, for instance:
>
> http://www.kettlebell.co.uk
>
> you'll see the same rounding at the edges of the handle. I've used these
> and _really_ like them, and if I was in the UK, I'd get them instead of
> DragonDoor kettlebells because they're less expensive.
>
> -S-
> http://www.kbnj.com
>
The round handle would have some advantages. Pavel looks like that guy who
helped the Viet Cong torture John Rambo.........
 >> Stay informed about: NY Barbell's New Kettlebell 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Lifting Equipment All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]