Welcome to TheFitnessForum.net!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Losing weight, except for arms?

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weights RSS
Related Topics:
Weight ranges for various exercises - Is there a web site that shows typical weight ranges for various exercises for various types of people and ages? For example, for squats, bench presses, various rows and flys, how much weight should a a person use and aim for? I would guess..

is this ok for a beginning weight workout? - This is what I've been doing for a weight workout, three times a week; I start out with ~5 minutes of cardio to warm-up Then the Leg Press Straight Leg Deadlifts Leg Lat Pulldown Bench Press Calf Raises Shoulder Press Bicep Curls ..

recommend a protein powder - price isn't a huge concern, I'd just like something that tastes good and is easy to mix

The Achilles heel of John "Whiny Bitch"Williams! - Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John Williams, I am now in something of a quandary. Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post and in great volume, about the subject which he is..

glycogen storage - How many grams of can be stored as glycogen in the muscle and liver? I tried searching for a max amount in grams and came up with one figure, ~600 grams. I'm sure it probably also varies from person to person. An endurance athlete
Next:  Weights: Bulking Up...what happened to moderation?  
Author Message
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 31) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:07 am
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)

Pete wrote:
> "Will Brink" <willbrink.RemoveThis@comcast.net> schreef:
>
>>> How about athletes who ignore some muscles for the sake of
>>> performance?
>
>> Try the semantics game with someone else. Different population,
>> different needs, different programs, and most athletes that ignore a
>> muscle "for the sake of performance" are setting themselves up for
>> an injury.
>
> I dont think its semantics.
>
> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2
> reasons.
> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.

If they're anything like sprinters, which I assume they are but on ice, then
arms contribute ~20%, or maybe more, of the power! That's why they work on
arms & arm mechanics, cos it's quite important!!!

> 2) IF they develop the upper body, the centre of gravity gets outta
> whack, and going trough curves becomes extremely difficult.
>
> I suspect Olympic gymnasts do something similair by ignoring legs.
>
> ----
> Pete



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 32) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:08 am
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Bully wrote:
> Pete wrote:
>> "Will Brink" <willbrink.DeleteThis@comcast.net> schreef:
>>
>>>> How about athletes who ignore some muscles for the sake of
>>>> performance?
>>
>>> Try the semantics game with someone else. Different population,
>>> different needs, different programs, and most athletes that ignore a
>>> muscle "for the sake of performance" are setting themselves up for
>>> an injury.
>>
>> I dont think its semantics.
>>
>> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2
>> reasons.
>> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.
>
> If they're anything like sprinters, which I assume they are but on
> ice, then arms contribute ~20%, or maybe more, of the power! That's
> why they work on arms & arm mechanics, cos it's quite important!!!

Erratum: the figure is nearer 10%!

>
>> 2) IF they develop the upper body, the centre of gravity gets outta
>> whack, and going trough curves becomes extremely difficult.
>>
>> I suspect Olympic gymnasts do something similair by ignoring legs.
>>
>> ----
>> Pete



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete

External


Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 1472



(Msg. 33) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bully" <bully1.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:

>> I dont think its semantics.

>> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2
>> reasons.
>> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.

> If they're anything like sprinters, which I assume they are but on ice,
> then arms contribute ~20%, or maybe more, of the power! That's why they
> work on arms & arm mechanics, cos it's quite important!!!

Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.

----
Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 34) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Pete wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:
>
>>> I dont think its semantics.
>
>>> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2
>>> reasons.
>>> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.
>
>> If they're anything like sprinters, which I assume they are but on
>> ice, then arms contribute ~20%, or maybe more, of the power! That's
>> why they work on arms & arm mechanics, cos it's quite important!!!
>
> Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
> In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.
>
> ----
> Pete

http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/flash/open_uk.asp?flash_id=ss

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 35) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Pete wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1.TakeThisOut@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:
>
>>> I dont think its semantics.
>
>>> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2
>>> reasons.
>>> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.
>
>> If they're anything like sprinters, which I assume they are but on
>> ice, then arms contribute ~20%, or maybe more, of the power! That's
>> why they work on arms & arm mechanics, cos it's quite important!!!
>
> Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
> In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.
>
> ----
> Pete

http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/programme/disciplines_uk.asp?DiscCode=SS
Look at those idiots with their arms all over the place eh?

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Andrzej Rosa

External


Since: Oct 29, 2005
Posts: 614



(Msg. 36) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dnia 2006-11-22 Will Brink napisał(a):
> In article <ek01pu$340$1@inews.gazeta.pl>, Andrzej Rosa
><bakters.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[...]
>> >> I'm finally sick of "are you
>> >> still lifting?" questions if I have any clothes on me, so this winter I
>> >> prioritize upper body training. By spring there will be no doubts if
>> >> I'm still lifting or not, even with my clothes on.
>> >
>> > So you hope!
>>
>> No, not just hope. I wasn't seriously training my lats pectorals and
>> arms since last winter. They are seriously undertrained. They grow
>> already.
>
> Well I hope you get what you want from it. It's nice when something you
> put into motion actually works.

I expect it will level off by mid winter and I can't say that I do all
it takes to get more mass, so I don't expect any miracles, but definite
improvement is something I'm simply sure about.

However, I should still eat more. In reality I won't, I'm not so
dedicated. Looking better is on a third place of my priority list, so
it must suffer a bit. I accept it.

>> > So is being an idiot, what's your point?
>>
>> I can't understand what's so idiotic about not training some muscles,
>> if one can do it safely? I seriously do not get it.
>
> That much I can see! It's simply a different opinion. For example, I deal
> with people all the time on this stuff. A women might email me or post on
> my forums something like "Will, I want to lose fat only on my left leg and
> I want to do it by eating only lettuce and water and sitting on my ass and
> I want to look life a fitness model" That may be what she wants, or how
> she plans to approach what she wants, but is it the right approach to
> take? No.

No, because it will not work. I don't judge somebody's goals; I just
try to see if the means he uses will get him closer to them.

> Should I support her approach or try and re direct her approach?
> Give her advice that will get better results, etc, etc. He can do what
> ever he wants, but the way he plans on doing it will be a sub par way of
> going about it, and that, I can't support. Lots of guys start out doing
> just upper body and progress onto lower body. Some never do and look
> silly, not to mention for burning calories, impacting metabolism, etc,
> whole body workouts plus aerobics beats upper body and aerobics every
> time.

I can't say it doesn't. I try to eat more but my belt refuses to
tighten. Long term, for fat loss, whole body workouts simply rule.
This I have to admit.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete

External


Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 1472



(Msg. 37) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bully" <bully1 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:

>> Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
>> In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.

> http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/programme/disciplines_uk.asp?DiscCode=SS
> Look at those idiots with their arms all over the place eh?

No.

They use the arms during the start and the curves, to maintain balance.

NOT because it will accelerate them. So upper body strength is useless for a
speed skater, and weight gains in the upper body causes problems.

The Russians used AS in the late eighties, and some of them were getting so
heavy they couldnt stay inside the curves.

I have been watching this sport for more than 2 decades.

----
Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 38) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Pete wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1 RemoveThis @proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:
>
>>> Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
>>> In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.
>
>> http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/programme/disciplines_uk.asp?DiscCode=SS
>> Look at those idiots with their arms all over the place eh?
>
> No.
>
> They use the arms during the start and the curves, to maintain
> balance.
> NOT because it will accelerate them. So upper body strength is
> useless for a speed skater, and weight gains in the upper body causes
> problems.
> The Russians used AS in the late eighties, and some of them were
> getting so heavy they couldnt stay inside the curves.
>
> I have been watching this sport for more than 2 decades.
>
> ----
> Pete

I think we should ask Lyle!!!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Hobbes

External


Since: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 702



(Msg. 39) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <4sje1cFvohedU1.RemoveThis@mid.individual.net>,
"Bully" <bully1.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:

> Pete wrote:
> > "Bully" <bully1.RemoveThis@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:
> >
> >>> Running is different than skating. The arms dont help.
> >>> In fact, the best skaters keep their arms completely motionless.
> >
> >> http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/programme/disciplines_uk.asp?DiscCode=SS
> >> Look at those idiots with their arms all over the place eh?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > They use the arms during the start and the curves, to maintain
> > balance.
> > NOT because it will accelerate them. So upper body strength is
> > useless for a speed skater, and weight gains in the upper body causes
> > problems.
> > The Russians used AS in the late eighties, and some of them were
> > getting so heavy they couldnt stay inside the curves.
> >
> > I have been watching this sport for more than 2 decades.
> >
> > ----
> > Pete
>
> I think we should ask Lyle!!!

They don't do much for the upper body.

Also, with the new clap-skates and virtually all ice being artificial
strength isn't as much an issue as it used to be. Technqiue roolz.

I get out to the oval in Calgary once in a while - even witnessed a
dutch world record there a year or so back when Lyle was skating there.
The chief judge was a former professor of mine and invited Elzi and
myself into the 'infield' to watch what was likely going to be a world
record skate. Dudes are moving darn quick.

--
Keith
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete

External


Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 1472



(Msg. 40) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Will Brink" <willbrink RemoveThis @comcast.net> schreef:

>> I dont think its semantics.

>> Speed skaters emphasize lower body and ignore upper body for 2 reasons.

>> 1) They dont use the muscles in the upper body to go faster.
>> 2) IF they develop the upper body, the centre of gravity gets outta
>> whack,
>> and going trough curves becomes extremely difficult.

>> I suspect Olympic gymnasts do something similair by ignoring legs.

> Which has nothing to do with joe average and his goals. One is performance
> based and specific and comparing them to some guy who wants to lose weight
> "except for arms" is stupid.

Cant argue with that.

> Use Apples for apples examples.

I was pointing out that ignoring certain bodyparts is done in several
sports.
And i am pretty sure that the avarage Joe can do this without getting
injured.

WHY somebody wants to do that is beyond me, but up to the individual. i
guess.

----
Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete

External


Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 1472



(Msg. 41) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Will Brink" <willbrink RemoveThis @comcast.net> schreef:

>> "Will Brink" <willbrink RemoveThis @comcast.net> schreef:

>> >> Do you call them silly and lazy too?

>> > Depends.

>> What criteria do you use to call somebody lazy?

> When they start using juice 19 months into training.

19 months ?!?!?!

I did it after 6 months. Perhaps 7.

But 200mg nandrolone doesnt qualify as "juice."

I was severely overtrained, and nandrolone is perfect for eh... recovery!

Yeah, thats the word. Recovery.

Bitch.

----
Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Will Brink

External


Since: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 241



(Msg. 42) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <4564825c$0$3257$dbd49001@news.wanadoo.nl>, "Pete"
<phoutstra.DeleteThis@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

> "Will Brink" <willbrink.DeleteThis@comcast.net> schreef:
>
> >> "Will Brink" <willbrink.DeleteThis@comcast.net> schreef:
>
> >> >> Do you call them silly and lazy too?
>
> >> > Depends.
>
> >> What criteria do you use to call somebody lazy?
>
> > When they start using juice 19 months into training.
>
> 19 months ?!?!?!
>
> I did it after 6 months. Perhaps 7.

I thought you had said 19 months for some reason.

>
> But 200mg nandrolone doesnt qualify as "juice."

Just like 400mg of T per week between cycles is considered "off" by some?

>
> I was severely overtrained, and nandrolone is perfect for eh... recovery!

It's good for a lot of things, but it's still juice.

>
> Yeah, thats the word. Recovery.

Recovery from banging fitness strippers?

>
> Bitch.
>
> ----
> Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Will Brink

External


Since: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 241



(Msg. 43) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <4sjf4eF102j72U1.DeleteThis@mid.individual.net>, "Bully"
<bully1.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:

>
> Apparently anabolic steroids can boost sporting performance - but at a
> serious cost to long-term health!!!

It depends. No blanket statements can be made there.
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bully

External


Since: Oct 04, 2006
Posts: 514



(Msg. 44) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Pete wrote:
> "Will Brink" <willbrink RemoveThis @comcast.net> schreef:
>
>>> "Will Brink" <willbrink RemoveThis @comcast.net> schreef:
>
>>>>> Do you call them silly and lazy too?
>
>>>> Depends.
>
>>> What criteria do you use to call somebody lazy?
>
>> When they start using juice 19 months into training.
>
> 19 months ?!?!?!
>
> I did it after 6 months. Perhaps 7.
>
> But 200mg nandrolone doesnt qualify as "juice."
>
> I was severely overtrained, and nandrolone is perfect for eh...
> recovery!
> Yeah, thats the word. Recovery.
>
> Bitch.
>
> ----
> Pete

Apparently anabolic steroids can boost sporting performance - but at a
serious cost to long-term health!!!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete

External


Since: Apr 16, 2006
Posts: 1472



(Msg. 45) Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Losing weight, except for arms? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bully" <bully1.DeleteThis@proteinbars.co.ok> schreef:

>> The Russians used AS in the late eighties, and some of them were
>> getting so heavy they couldnt stay inside the curves.

>> I have been watching this sport for more than 2 decades.

> I think we should ask Lyle!!!

Good idea.
Wgere can he be found these days? He will be glad to hear from me.

Just visualize this;

A cyclist goes about 60 kilometers/hour. His arms dont move.

But then he starts to move his arms. Will that make him faster?

A 1500 meter is done in about 1:45. During the second lap they reach max
speed on the straight ends.

Do you think moving the arms in a way a sprinter does will make them faster?

----
Pete
 >> Stay informed about: Losing weight, except for arms? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weights All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 3 of 7

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]