Welcome to TheFitnessForum.net!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high..

 
Goto page 1, 2, 3
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Training & Fat Loss RSS
Next:  Lose weight with Hoodia as featured in "O&qu..  
Author Message
Brian Link

External


Since: Dec 30, 2004
Posts: 73



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight?
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)

Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
every night.

On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.

Thanks as always for any tips.

BLink
--------------------------
"The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"

 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jason Earl

External


Since: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 660



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Link <blink RemoveThis @visi.com> writes:

> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes,
> etc. Way too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around
> the lake every night.

A two mile walk is cardio. If it happens to be cardio that you enjoy,
then more power to you.

> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.

More lean mass hasn't been deflated here, it simply hasn't been
over-inflated. You will burn more calories at rest as you add more
lean mass, and you will also burn more calories when you are
exercising as you add more muscle.

Muscle is good. In fact, if you diet without lifting weights you will
undoubtedly lower your metabolism. Lifting was definitely the "secret
sauce" in my own weight loss success.

I think that strength training combined with a two mile walk and a
good diet is probably a good plan. You also might try working in some
high repetition one arm snatches or swings, and you can also take a
look and see if some sort of Tabata interval sounds interesting, but
you could do worse than weight training and walking for exercise.

> Thanks as always for any tips.

Keep good notes...

Jason

 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Curt James

External


Since: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 1479



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Link wrote:
> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.

Brisk is good. Surprised)

If you're no fan of cardio, what's your opinion on nutrition? Have you
seen any of my mentions of The Abs Diet? Available online at
http://theabsdiet.com/ or at your local Wal-Mart for a pittance. And if
you read what Zinczenko has to say about aerobic exercise versus weight
training I believe you'll be a happy camper. "Muscle eats fat," the
author states enthusiastically.

(Okay, those are just three words on paper, but I feel guilt-free
characterizing those words as having been issued "enthusiastically.")

> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone,

Don't be so sure.

> what would be the best way to maximize fat loss by resistance
> training? It's my understanding that the whole "more lean mass
> means more fat burning" has been deflated here, so I'm just
> concentrating on the workout itself.

Cool.

> Thanks as always for any tips.

Buy the book.

> BLink

--
Curt
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2036



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Brian Link" <blink RemoveThis @visi.com> wrote in message
news:7el9e2li81t0rbgo2j4g6jar2drrit22hr@4ax.com...
> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.
>
> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>
> Thanks as always for any tips.

The DragonDoor site does promise fat loss "without the dishonor of dieting
and aerobics." The usual formula is high-rep kettlebell swings (once you've
got the technique down, of course). I'm pretty sure DD just came out with
their first DVD targeted specifically at fat loss. Again, poke around on
their site, if you can't find it but are interested, let me know.

http://www.dragondoor.com/?kbid=1022 is a link that uses my affiliate ID.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com


>
> BLink
> --------------------------
> "The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jason Earl

External


Since: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 660



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Steve Freides" <steve DeleteThis @fridayscomputer.com> writes:

> "Brian Link" <blink DeleteThis @visi.com> wrote in message
> news:7el9e2li81t0rbgo2j4g6jar2drrit22hr@4ax.com...
>> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
>> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
>> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
>> every night.
>>
>> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
>> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
>> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
>> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
>> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>>
>> Thanks as always for any tips.
>
> The DragonDoor site does promise fat loss "without the dishonor of
> dieting and aerobics." The usual formula is high-rep kettlebell
> swings (once you've got the technique down, of course). I'm pretty
> sure DD just came out with their first DVD targeted specifically at
> fat loss. Again, poke around on their site, if you can't find it
> but are interested, let me know.
>
> http://www.dragondoor.com/?kbid=1022 is a link that uses my
> affiliate ID.

When I said lots of one arm snatches and swings, this is what I really
meant. I just didn't want to be the guy that brought up Pavel Smile.
Interestingly enough I just tested my 1.5 mile run and it was faster
than it had been in some time despite the fact that I no longer run on
a regular basis.

Not that I was ever very fast, but improvement at running without
having to actually run is a pretty big bonus in my book.

You could probably swing and snatch a dumbbell instead, but kbells are
more fun. I certainly am glad that I took Steve's advice and picked
one up.

Jason
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Curt James

External


Since: Feb 23, 2005
Posts: 1479



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:10 pm
Post subject: The Abs Diet [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jason Earl wrote:
[...]

> OK, that's like the 10th time I have seen you suggest "The Abs Diet"
> (and no, I didn't google to see how many times you have actually
> mentioned this book).

Hmm...

(Googles)

"26 results for curt , abs diet"

....

I was curious.

> I honestly thought you were kidding.

No joke. Surprised)

> So what's the deal. I checked out the website and this is
> representative of the sort of claims made.
>
> Simply put, The Abs Diet is a scientifically proven food plan that
> turns on your metabolic fat furnaces and puts the resulting energy
> to work building muscle. Within 2 weeks, you'll lose up to 12
> pounds of fat--from your belly first! From there, you'll convert
> fat to muscle with a sensible exercise (30 minutes three times a
> week) and eating (six meals a day!) plan that will give you your
> best physique and keep you at optimal health for life. This is a
> diet plan anyone can stick to: The portions are man-size, the
> instructions are simple, and the results will be food that even
> Archie Bunker would love!
>
> This sort of ad copy rings my alarm bells, and it is not the worst of
> it either. Heck, there are several places on the website where the
> diet promises to "turn fat into muscle."

Some I'm sure would say it smacks of hucksterism, but I see it as an
entertaining style of writing. References to pop culture in Archie
Bunker, enthusiasm-building visual imagery in "fat furnaces" and, yes,
a BUY NOW! TODAY! directive in "you'll lose up to 12 pounds of
fat--from your belly first!" But the information is rock solid.

I know I'm a cheerleader for this book and, yes, biased, so check out
what Publishers Weekly has to say:

Eat everything. Concentrate on whole grains. Drink milk. Balance
protein with carbohydrates. Avoid processed sugars. Do some exercise.
The idea that a diet book making such proposals comes as a pleasant
surprise shows just how far afield we've gone in the search for new
ways to be fit. The only thing new about this diet by the
editor-in-chief of Men's Health is its name, and this, one can presume,
is because nowadays, a book simply called "Sensible Eating" wouldn't
sell. The book's title is indeed misleading; only the final chapter
deals solely with abs. The rest is full of rational recommendations for
a realistic diet plan: eat more and smaller meals; have oatmeal in the
morning for a nourishing breakfast; don't starve yourself; drink plenty
of water; and stay away from sodas and foods that contain high-fructose
corn syrup. Whether readers will, in the end, walk away with abs of
steel is not really the point. They'll control their weight in a
healthy way, without counting calories, cutting out whole food groups
or supporting the beef futures market. Best of all, this book tells
readers why it works: increase your body's metabolism, gain some muscle
and fat burns away. The authors make this seem like a fresh and very
attainable ideal.
/quote from
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1579549985/104-4021844-4537547?v=glan...n=28315
aka http://tinyurl.com/pmykv

The Amazon link or TinyURL link will take you to Amazon's Abs Diet page
which, along with book specifics, offers 146 customer reviews not all
of which are especially glowing, but that might dull your alarm bells a
bit.

> So what's the deal with this book?

It's Harley orange! What can I say?

Seriously, I was first introduced to the book courtesy of Amazing Abs,
a just-less-than-magazine-size book from Men's Health and the good
people at Rodale Inc.

Amazing Abs has much the same info as The Abs Diet but with a lot more
pictures. The cover screams "LOSE YOUR GUT! Exclusive! Abs Diet
Excerpt" and has a pic of a guy displaying a cover model six-pack.

I liked the humor and no-nonsense approach used in that book. Diet and
exercise plans, visually appealing with tons of pics of male and female
models demonstrating correct exercise performance. Amazing Abs is a
collection of bits and pieces of other Rodale books edited together in
a truly artful way, imo. Informative, attractive, accessible.

Enjoying that book piqued my interest in The Abs Diet. Fwiw, it's a New
York Times bestseller. It's written in an engaging manner,
straightforward, intelligent, and, yes, again, with humor. Early in the
book, the message "Changing the Way You Think About the Word Diet" is
offered as a headline. The book does just that. The writers say it
better than I ever could:

"For years - or maybe for all your life - you've probably had one
notion about what dieting needs to be. Restrict your foods, eat like a
supermodel, sweat on the treadmill, and you'll lose fat. In reality,
those could be the very reasons why you couldn't lose weight. It's why
you gained back what you lost. It's the reason why your steamboat
metabolism may have geared down to that of an anchored barge. It's why
you don't see much progress when you try new weight-loss programs. And
it's why the only real recipe many diet plans offer is a recipe for
pecan-encrusted failure."

That's some visual imagery. I like it. A lot. Yeah, it could probably
be boiled down to five or ten pages of text, but for ten bucks, this
book and its philosophy, imo, can't be beat.

And, yes, David Zinczenko (with Ted Spiker) has a good bit of P.T.
Barnum or carnival barker in him, but, imo, this book is not for
suckers*. Zinczenko's enthusiasm leaps from the page. Good information,
visually appealing, right price, and a motivational writing style all
equal a book I'm glad I purchased. Ymmv. ;o)

AGAIN, YMMV! HOWEVER ~*I*~ FOUND IT INTERESTING! Surprised)

I also picked up The Abs Diet Eat Right Every Time Guide which includes
789 of what the authors call the best on-the-go food choices. It's
offered as a complete supermarket survival guide and contains 60
six-minute meals for a six-pack.

> Jason

*bonus trivia wrt the suckers quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There's_a_sucker_born_every_minute

9 out of 10 small coteries of sycophants approve of this post.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
ranieri

External


Since: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: 48



(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:15 am
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Brian Link" <blink RemoveThis @visi.com> wrote in message
news:7el9e2li81t0rbgo2j4g6jar2drrit22hr@4ax.com...
> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.
>
> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>
> Thanks as always for any tips.
>

Brian, you haven't been paying attention - prolly spent too much time
spouting your political vitriol. Fat loss is much more a function of diet
than any rep / % scheme. Lift to get strong, diet to get lean.
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jason Earl

External


Since: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 660



(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:47 am
Post subject: The Abs Diet? Was:Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Curt James" <curtjames.DeleteThis@gmail.com> writes:

> Brian Link wrote:
>> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
>> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes,
>> etc. Way too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk
>> around the lake every night.
>
> Brisk is good. Surprised)
>
> If you're no fan of cardio, what's your opinion on nutrition? Have
> you seen any of my mentions of The Abs Diet? Available online at
> http://theabsdiet.com/ or at your local Wal-Mart for a pittance. And
> if you read what Zinczenko has to say about aerobic exercise versus
> weight training I believe you'll be a happy camper. "Muscle eats
> fat," the author states enthusiastically.
>
> (Okay, those are just three words on paper, but I feel guilt-free
> characterizing those words as having been issued
> "enthusiastically.")

OK, that's like the 10th time I have seen you suggest "The Abs Diet"
(and no, I didn't google to see how many times you have actually
mentioned this book). I honestly thought you were kidding.

So what's the deal. I checked out the website and this is
representative of the sort of claims made.

Simply put, The Abs Diet is a scientifically proven food plan that
turns on your metabolic fat furnaces and puts the resulting energy
to work building muscle. Within 2 weeks, you'll lose up to 12
pounds of fat--from your belly first! From there, you'll convert
fat to muscle with a sensible exercise (30 minutes three times a
week) and eating (six meals a day!) plan that will give you your
best physique and keep you at optimal health for life. This is a
diet plan anyone can stick to: The portions are man-size, the
instructions are simple, and the results will be food that even
Archie Bunker would love!

This sort of ad copy rings my alarm bells, and it is not the worst of
it either. Heck, there are several places on the website where the
diet promises to "turn fat into muscle."

So what's the deal with this book?

Jason
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bill Eitner

External


Since: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 34



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:37 am
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Link wrote:
> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it.

Deep down you may have the same apprehension
about it that I do. It's may be more likely
that it's best for scale weight loss, but
not necessarily fat loss while sparing hard
earned muscle in the case of drug-free trainees.

> Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.
>
> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training?

How about low reps/high weight/low rest.
That's what I'm doing currently while
dieting. It's a hybrid of circuit
training and mass training. It's as
far as I'm willing to go in the direction
of aerobic work. Minimal rest cranks
up the heart rate, respiration, and
perspiration plenty. It's also very
efficient in that it's over with quickly.
The only drawback is that it doesn't
provide for the use of maximum poundages.
That's the concession that has to be
accepted in exchange for the cardio-like
benefits.

> It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.

The fact that one doesn't do cardio doesn't
negate the effect of a diet with a negative
calorie balance. My philosophy is to never
stop trying to get stronger and build more
muscle--even while trying to lose fat. I
use dietary adjustments to slowly decrease
the bodyfat percentage. The low rest
training is an additional optional component.
--
> Thanks as always for any tips.
>
> BLink
> --------------------------
> "The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2036



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:31 am
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bill Eitner" <kd6tas DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Uc6Fg.10328$kO3.5765@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
>
> Brian Link wrote:
>> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
>> can't bring myself to it.
>
> Deep down you may have the same apprehension
> about it that I do. It's may be more likely
> that it's best for scale weight loss, but
> not necessarily fat loss while sparing hard
> earned muscle in the case of drug-free trainees.
>
>> Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
>> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
>> every night.
>>
>> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
>> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
>> maximize fat loss by resistance training?
>
> How about low reps/high weight/low rest.
> That's what I'm doing currently while
> dieting. It's a hybrid of circuit
> training and mass training. It's as
> far as I'm willing to go in the direction
> of aerobic work. Minimal rest cranks
> up the heart rate, respiration, and
> perspiration plenty. It's also very
> efficient in that it's over with quickly.
> The only drawback is that it doesn't
> provide for the use of maximum poundages.
> That's the concession that has to be
> accepted in exchange for the cardio-like
> benefits.
>
>> It's my understanding that
>> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
>> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>
> The fact that one doesn't do cardio doesn't
> negate the effect of a diet with a negative
> calorie balance. My philosophy is to never
> stop trying to get stronger and build more
> muscle--even while trying to lose fat. I
> use dietary adjustments to slowly decrease
> the bodyfat percentage. The low rest
> training is an additional optional component.
> --
>> Thanks as always for any tips.
>>
>> BLink
>> --------------------------
>> "The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"

This is a sensible approach, IMHO. It's not my first choice for myself,
that's all.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jason Earl

External


Since: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 660



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 6:47 pm
Post subject: Re: The Abs Diet [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

DZ <1609.TakeThisOut@2447818409.1854730113.29768.3413.12036> writes:

> Jason Earl <jearl.TakeThisOut@xmission.com> wrote:
>> If there is one thing that I have learned in my career it is that a
>> good product is worthless without marketing.
>
> that reminded me of this in a bizarre opposite sort of way -
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/science/15math.html?ei=5070&en=2c566...791ddd1

Yeah, it would appear that academics are somewhat of a special case
Smile.

Jason
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bill Eitner

External


Since: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 34



(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Steve Freides wrote:
> "Bill Eitner" <kd6tas.RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Uc6Fg.10328$kO3.5765@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> Brian Link wrote:
>>> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
>>> can't bring myself to it.
>> Deep down you may have the same apprehension
>> about it that I do. It's may be more likely
>> that it's best for scale weight loss, but
>> not necessarily fat loss while sparing hard
>> earned muscle in the case of drug-free trainees.
>>
>>> Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
>>> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
>>> every night.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
>>> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
>>> maximize fat loss by resistance training?
>> How about low reps/high weight/low rest.
>> That's what I'm doing currently while
>> dieting. It's a hybrid of circuit
>> training and mass training. It's as
>> far as I'm willing to go in the direction
>> of aerobic work. Minimal rest cranks
>> up the heart rate, respiration, and
>> perspiration plenty. It's also very
>> efficient in that it's over with quickly.
>> The only drawback is that it doesn't
>> provide for the use of maximum poundages.
>> That's the concession that has to be
>> accepted in exchange for the cardio-like
>> benefits.
>>
>>> It's my understanding that
>>> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
>>> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>> The fact that one doesn't do cardio doesn't
>> negate the effect of a diet with a negative
>> calorie balance. My philosophy is to never
>> stop trying to get stronger and build more
>> muscle--even while trying to lose fat. I
>> use dietary adjustments to slowly decrease
>> the bodyfat percentage. The low rest
>> training is an additional optional component.
>> --
>>> Thanks as always for any tips.
>>>
>>> BLink
>>> --------------------------
>>> "The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"
>
> This is a sensible approach, IMHO. It's not my first choice for myself,
> that's all.

Just as kettlebell training isn't mine.
I'm with Pete when it comes to "cattlebells."
--
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
DZ

External


Since: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:26 pm
Post subject: Re: The Abs Diet [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
dankel

External


Since: Aug 19, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high weight? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Link wrote:
> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.
>
> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>
> Thanks as always for any tips.
>
> BLink
> --------------------------
> "The worst thing about censorship is [redacted]"
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Peter K.

External


Since: Aug 19, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 15) Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 8/17/06 4:50 PM, in article 7el9e2li81t0rbgo2j4g6jar2drrit22hr DeleteThis @4ax.com,
"Brian Link" <blink DeleteThis @visi.com> wrote:

> Yes, I know, the best exercise for fat loss is cardio, but I just
> can't bring myself to it. Stair masters, ellipticals, bikes, etc. Way
> too boring. The best I can do is a brisk 2 mile walk around the lake
> every night.

Do you have any type of landmark that surrounds the lake at regular
intervals? The reason I ask is that I've had very good results with walking
two miles at a very brisk pace with an all out sprint thrown in at regular
intervals. Basically I act like I'm being chased by a pissed off bear for
about 200m and then return to walking. I do this about four times for every
mile I cover at regular intervals. If you don't have a reliable distance
indicator you could always go with a stopwatch and bolt 30 seconds and then
walk briskly for a couple of minutes or something to that effect.

I think I've heard this referred to as HIIT (High Intensity Interval
Training) but I'm not sure that I'm working hard enough to be considered in
that category. Thanks to the army (any my stupidity for not going into the
air force) I can no longer run any appreciable distance without my knees
acting up. Squats and deads are no problem though.

> On the other hand, I love lifting. So, accepting that I'm not gonna
> see huge fat losses lifting alone, what would be the best way to
> maximize fat loss by resistance training? It's my understanding that
> the whole "more lean mass means more fat burning" has been deflated
> here, so I'm just concentrating on the workout itself.
>
> Thanks as always for any tips.

I can't help you here except to say keep lifting. As an anecdote I do a 5x5
workout in addition to the walk/run routine above. Squats, deadlifts,
dumbbell military press, weighted dips, weighted pullups, weighted chinups
with each exercise performed once a week using five sets of five reps. I
normally spread these among two or three workout days. This week I'm lifting
with a 60 second rest in between each set and by the time the fifth set has
arrive if I'm not at failure I'm damned close. It works for me (for now).

PK
 >> Stay informed about: Lifting for fat loss - high reps/low weight? low reps/high.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Training & Fat Loss All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2, 3
Page 1 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]