Welcome to TheFitnessForum.net!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb?

 
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Aerobics RSS
Author Message
caseydoug3

External


Since: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:10 pm
Post subject: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb?
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>aerobic (more info?)

I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier at the
end of July. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I have
no illusions about the difficulty of this climb. I would appreciate any
thoughts about the most appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to do
in the final months. In particular, I'd like to know how much benefit I
would get from mixing some kind of interval training in with the rest
of my workout.

Currently, I try to take training hikes once or twice a week. These are
fairly strenuous (for me), typically involving about 3500 feet of gain
in four miles carrying a 40 pound pack -- Mount Si, for those of you
who know it. The ascent takes a little under two hours. My heart rate
stays between 140 - 160 the entire time, averaging around 150 (my heart
rate maximum is naturally high, I think around 190). I also do the
Stairmaster several times a week for about 45 minutes each. Again, I
push myself pretty hard, with my heart rate often staying above 160 for
20 or 30 minutes in a session. Finally, I work out with weights three
times a week for an hour each. I don't monitor my heart rate then, but
I know it stays elevated for much of that time.

I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training into
one or two of my Stairmaster sessions each week. The idea would be to
push my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it
drop back below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern
for the entire session. I read that this is a good and quick way to
increase aerobic capacity. I also read, however, that it may not be
that helpful if your goal is endurance -- i.e., to maintain a hard pace
for hours at a time. Any advice on this would be welcome.

Also, are there any benchmarks to help me determine what kind of
progress I've made to date -- some test to tell me how close I am to
being ready (e.g., the time it takes to get up Mount Si or my average
heart rate during that hike)? I don't expect to be the fittest or
fastest person on the mountain, but I'd sure like to know whether I'm
seriously behind where I need to be by this time.

I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two years
ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
had a couple of days to acclimate.


Thanks.

 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
caseydoug3

External


Since: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 3:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Steve Freides wrote:
> <caseydoug3 RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1149793843.816198.105590@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier at the
> > end of July. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I have
> > no illusions about the difficulty of this climb. I would appreciate
> > any
> > thoughts about the most appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to do
> > in the final months. In particular, I'd like to know how much benefit
> > I
> > would get from mixing some kind of interval training in with the rest
> > of my workout.
> >
> > Currently, I try to take training hikes once or twice a week. These
> > are
> > fairly strenuous (for me), typically involving about 3500 feet of gain
> > in four miles carrying a 40 pound pack -- Mount Si, for those of you
> > who know it. The ascent takes a little under two hours. My heart rate
> > stays between 140 - 160 the entire time, averaging around 150 (my
> > heart
> > rate maximum is naturally high, I think around 190). I also do the
> > Stairmaster several times a week for about 45 minutes each. Again, I
> > push myself pretty hard, with my heart rate often staying above 160
> > for
> > 20 or 30 minutes in a session. Finally, I work out with weights three
> > times a week for an hour each. I don't monitor my heart rate then, but
> > I know it stays elevated for much of that time.
> >
> > I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training
> > into
> > one or two of my Stairmaster sessions each week. The idea would be to
> > push my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it
> > drop back below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern
> > for the entire session. I read that this is a good and quick way to
> > increase aerobic capacity. I also read, however, that it may not be
> > that helpful if your goal is endurance -- i.e., to maintain a hard
> > pace
> > for hours at a time. Any advice on this would be welcome.
> >
> > Also, are there any benchmarks to help me determine what kind of
> > progress I've made to date -- some test to tell me how close I am to
> > being ready (e.g., the time it takes to get up Mount Si or my average
> > heart rate during that hike)? I don't expect to be the fittest or
> > fastest person on the mountain, but I'd sure like to know whether I'm
> > seriously behind where I need to be by this time.
> >
> > I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
> > altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two
> > years
> > ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
> > feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
> > had a couple of days to acclimate.
>
> Improving your strength can help - it makes everything relatively easier
> and can increase your resistance to injury. If you're not lifting
> weights, I suggest you add that.
>
> I think your interval idea is a fine one - give it a try. Part of the
> reason for doing higher-intensity work is to increase your efficiency,
> both mechanical and aerobic - you might try taking short sections of
> hikes at a brisker pace as another form of interval training. Most
> training for endurance focuses on endurance but includes high-intensity
> work, usually in a few different forms.
>
> In short, I think you're thinking about this correctly - give some
> things a try and see how they work out for you.
>
> Just my opinion - I am not a climber, just an ex run/bike/swim guy who
> now mostly lifts.
>
> -S-
> http://www.kbnj.com

Thanks, Steve. Yes, I am lifting three times a week, each time focusing
on different muscle groups (chest/back; shoulders/triceps;
legs/biceps). I'm also gradually adding weight to my pack when I hike
or do the Stairmaster. That may be why I'm not seeing much of a drop in
my heart rate for similar exercise.

 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2032



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<caseydoug3.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149793843.816198.105590@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier at the
> end of July. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I have
> no illusions about the difficulty of this climb. I would appreciate
> any
> thoughts about the most appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to do
> in the final months. In particular, I'd like to know how much benefit
> I
> would get from mixing some kind of interval training in with the rest
> of my workout.
>
> Currently, I try to take training hikes once or twice a week. These
> are
> fairly strenuous (for me), typically involving about 3500 feet of gain
> in four miles carrying a 40 pound pack -- Mount Si, for those of you
> who know it. The ascent takes a little under two hours. My heart rate
> stays between 140 - 160 the entire time, averaging around 150 (my
> heart
> rate maximum is naturally high, I think around 190). I also do the
> Stairmaster several times a week for about 45 minutes each. Again, I
> push myself pretty hard, with my heart rate often staying above 160
> for
> 20 or 30 minutes in a session. Finally, I work out with weights three
> times a week for an hour each. I don't monitor my heart rate then, but
> I know it stays elevated for much of that time.
>
> I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training
> into
> one or two of my Stairmaster sessions each week. The idea would be to
> push my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it
> drop back below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern
> for the entire session. I read that this is a good and quick way to
> increase aerobic capacity. I also read, however, that it may not be
> that helpful if your goal is endurance -- i.e., to maintain a hard
> pace
> for hours at a time. Any advice on this would be welcome.
>
> Also, are there any benchmarks to help me determine what kind of
> progress I've made to date -- some test to tell me how close I am to
> being ready (e.g., the time it takes to get up Mount Si or my average
> heart rate during that hike)? I don't expect to be the fittest or
> fastest person on the mountain, but I'd sure like to know whether I'm
> seriously behind where I need to be by this time.
>
> I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
> altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two
> years
> ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
> feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
> had a couple of days to acclimate.

Improving your strength can help - it makes everything relatively easier
and can increase your resistance to injury. If you're not lifting
weights, I suggest you add that.

I think your interval idea is a fine one - give it a try. Part of the
reason for doing higher-intensity work is to increase your efficiency,
both mechanical and aerobic - you might try taking short sections of
hikes at a brisker pace as another form of interval training. Most
training for endurance focuses on endurance but includes high-intensity
work, usually in a few different forms.

In short, I think you're thinking about this correctly - give some
things a try and see how they work out for you.

Just my opinion - I am not a climber, just an ex run/bike/swim guy who
now mostly lifts.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
LurfysMa

External


Since: May 27, 2006
Posts: 33



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:04:40 -0400, "Steve Freides"
<steve DeleteThis @fridayscomputer.com> wrote:

>Improving your strength can help - it makes everything relatively easier
>and can increase your resistance to injury. If you're not lifting
>weights, I suggest you add that.

This is such an important point. I have always had poor balance, or so
I thought. I was never a good skier (water or snow) and a miserable
failure at windsurfing.

A few years ago I started weight lifting. I found squats particularly
difficult. When I started, I had some difficulty doing even one squat
without any weight.

Now, after increasing my ability with squats, I find that my balance
is suddenly much better. I could probably have been an olympic skier
if I had started doing squats in high school. Well, maybe not.

Same thing with tennis. I've always been a fairly big hitter, but not
always so consistent. Now that I am stronger overall, I can actually
hit the bal harder with more accuracy. I think it's because I am not
so close to my limit as before. I can now hit the ball as hard as I
ever could, but with only 50% of my maximum strength, which means I am
more under control.

--
For email, use usenet-20060507[at]spamex[dot]com
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve Freides

External


Since: Jan 08, 2005
Posts: 2032



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<caseydoug3.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149967412.864041.323950@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Steve Freides wrote:
>> <caseydoug3.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1149793843.816198.105590@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier at
>> > the
>> > end of July. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I
>> > have
>> > no illusions about the difficulty of this climb. I would appreciate
>> > any
>> > thoughts about the most appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to
>> > do
>> > in the final months. In particular, I'd like to know how much
>> > benefit
>> > I
>> > would get from mixing some kind of interval training in with the
>> > rest
>> > of my workout.
>> >
>> > Currently, I try to take training hikes once or twice a week. These
>> > are
>> > fairly strenuous (for me), typically involving about 3500 feet of
>> > gain
>> > in four miles carrying a 40 pound pack -- Mount Si, for those of
>> > you
>> > who know it. The ascent takes a little under two hours. My heart
>> > rate
>> > stays between 140 - 160 the entire time, averaging around 150 (my
>> > heart
>> > rate maximum is naturally high, I think around 190). I also do the
>> > Stairmaster several times a week for about 45 minutes each. Again,
>> > I
>> > push myself pretty hard, with my heart rate often staying above 160
>> > for
>> > 20 or 30 minutes in a session. Finally, I work out with weights
>> > three
>> > times a week for an hour each. I don't monitor my heart rate then,
>> > but
>> > I know it stays elevated for much of that time.
>> >
>> > I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training
>> > into
>> > one or two of my Stairmaster sessions each week. The idea would be
>> > to
>> > push my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it
>> > drop back below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this
>> > pattern
>> > for the entire session. I read that this is a good and quick way to
>> > increase aerobic capacity. I also read, however, that it may not be
>> > that helpful if your goal is endurance -- i.e., to maintain a hard
>> > pace
>> > for hours at a time. Any advice on this would be welcome.
>> >
>> > Also, are there any benchmarks to help me determine what kind of
>> > progress I've made to date -- some test to tell me how close I am
>> > to
>> > being ready (e.g., the time it takes to get up Mount Si or my
>> > average
>> > heart rate during that hike)? I don't expect to be the fittest or
>> > fastest person on the mountain, but I'd sure like to know whether
>> > I'm
>> > seriously behind where I need to be by this time.
>> >
>> > I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect
>> > of
>> > altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two
>> > years
>> > ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about
>> > 13,800
>> > feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I
>> > also
>> > had a couple of days to acclimate.
>>
>> Improving your strength can help - it makes everything relatively
>> easier
>> and can increase your resistance to injury. If you're not lifting
>> weights, I suggest you add that.
>>
>> I think your interval idea is a fine one - give it a try. Part of
>> the
>> reason for doing higher-intensity work is to increase your
>> efficiency,
>> both mechanical and aerobic - you might try taking short sections of
>> hikes at a brisker pace as another form of interval training. Most
>> training for endurance focuses on endurance but includes
>> high-intensity
>> work, usually in a few different forms.
>>
>> In short, I think you're thinking about this correctly - give some
>> things a try and see how they work out for you.
>>
>> Just my opinion - I am not a climber, just an ex run/bike/swim guy
>> who
>> now mostly lifts.
>>
>> -S-
>> http://www.kbnj.com
>
> Thanks, Steve. Yes, I am lifting three times a week, each time
> focusing
> on different muscle groups (chest/back; shoulders/triceps;
> legs/biceps). I'm also gradually adding weight to my pack when I hike
> or do the Stairmaster. That may be why I'm not seeing much of a drop
> in
> my heart rate for similar exercise.

The one hiking program I heard about featured walks on the treadmill at
a steep incline, 10-12%, I think.

If you're interested in taking this sort of thing (planning your
training) more seriously, Steve Maxwell in Philadelphia is a real genius
at designed training programs for specific strength/endurance
activities. I believe his web site is http://www.stevemaxwell.com and
you could get him to work with you over the Internet. He's a multi-time
Masters Brazilian Jujitsu world champion and a great guy.

Good luck to you.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Denise Howard

External


Since: May 25, 2004
Posts: 113



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <i7im82dlh48kk3sbg46mnlaslrid8va8d5 DeleteThis @4ax.com>, LurfysMa
<invalid DeleteThis @invalid.invalid> wrote:

> This is such an important point. I have always had poor balance, or so
> I thought. I was never a good skier (water or snow) and a miserable
> failure at windsurfing.
>
> A few years ago I started weight lifting. I found squats particularly
> difficult. When I started, I had some difficulty doing even one squat
> without any weight.
>
> Now, after increasing my ability with squats, I find that my balance
> is suddenly much better. I could probably have been an olympic skier
> if I had started doing squats in high school. Well, maybe not.

Squats and lunges recruit all sorts of stabilizer muscles--i.e., they
involve not just the large, moving muscles that we usually think of
like the quadriceps, gluteals and hamstrings, but also smaller muscles
in your legs and feet and the "core" muscles of your torso, which
provide stability and balance as you execute the movement. So yes,
squats and lunges are terrific for improving balance!

As an aside, senior fitness classes these days are focusing more on
such movements to counteract the "poor balance" that too many seniors
develop over time by _not_ doing these kind of movements in their daily
lives.

--
Denise denise dot howard at comcast dot net
ACE and AFAA certified fitness instructor
AFAA step and kickboxing certified
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
LurfysMa

External


Since: May 27, 2006
Posts: 33



(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:51:03 -0700, Denise Howard
<denise.TakeThisOut@invalid.domain> wrote:

>In article <i7im82dlh48kk3sbg46mnlaslrid8va8d5.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>, LurfysMa
><invalid.TakeThisOut@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> This is such an important point. I have always had poor balance, or so
>> I thought. I was never a good skier (water or snow) and a miserable
>> failure at windsurfing.
>>
>> A few years ago I started weight lifting. I found squats particularly
>> difficult. When I started, I had some difficulty doing even one squat
>> without any weight.
>>
>> Now, after increasing my ability with squats, I find that my balance
>> is suddenly much better. I could probably have been an olympic skier
>> if I had started doing squats in high school. Well, maybe not.
>
>Squats and lunges recruit all sorts of stabilizer muscles--i.e., they
>involve not just the large, moving muscles that we usually think of
>like the quadriceps, gluteals and hamstrings, but also smaller muscles
>in your legs and feet and the "core" muscles of your torso, which
>provide stability and balance as you execute the movement. So yes,
>squats and lunges are terrific for improving balance!
>
>As an aside, senior fitness classes these days are focusing more on
>such movements to counteract the "poor balance" that too many seniors
>develop over time by _not_ doing these kind of movements in their daily
>lives.

Makes sense to me -- being one of those unbalanced seniors. Wink

--
For email, use usenet-20060507[at]spamex[dot]com
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
caseydoug3

External


Since: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:33 am
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

LurfysMa wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:51:03 -0700, Denise Howard
> <denise.TakeThisOut@invalid.domain> wrote:
>
> >In article <i7im82dlh48kk3sbg46mnlaslrid8va8d5.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>, LurfysMa
> ><invalid.TakeThisOut@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> This is such an important point. I have always had poor balance, or so
> >> I thought. I was never a good skier (water or snow) and a miserable
> >> failure at windsurfing.
> >>
> >> A few years ago I started weight lifting. I found squats particularly
> >> difficult. When I started, I had some difficulty doing even one squat
> >> without any weight.
> >>
> >> Now, after increasing my ability with squats, I find that my balance
> >> is suddenly much better. I could probably have been an olympic skier
> >> if I had started doing squats in high school. Well, maybe not.
> >
> >Squats and lunges recruit all sorts of stabilizer muscles--i.e., they
> >involve not just the large, moving muscles that we usually think of
> >like the quadriceps, gluteals and hamstrings, but also smaller muscles
> >in your legs and feet and the "core" muscles of your torso, which
> >provide stability and balance as you execute the movement. So yes,
> >squats and lunges are terrific for improving balance!
> >
> >As an aside, senior fitness classes these days are focusing more on
> >such movements to counteract the "poor balance" that too many seniors
> >develop over time by _not_ doing these kind of movements in their daily
> >lives.
>
> Makes sense to me -- being one of those unbalanced seniors. Wink
>
> --
> For email, use usenet-20060507[at]spamex[dot]com

I agree that strength training is important: I'm supposed to carry 40+
pounds up 9,000 feet of gain over icy cravasses at altitude. Much as
I'd like to deny it, I'm not getting any younger either. However, I'm
far more concerned about the aerobic aspects of this effort. Can anyone
suggest a training goal that will give me a sense of how far along I am
in my conditioning (e.g., you need to be able to climb x feet per hour
without pushing your heart rate above y% of it maximum)? Are there any
meaningful benchmarks?
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Denise Howard

External


Since: May 25, 2004
Posts: 113



(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <1150007620.423023.237470.DeleteThis@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
<caseydoug3.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that strength training is important: I'm supposed to carry 40+
> pounds up 9,000 feet of gain over icy cravasses at altitude. Much as
> I'd like to deny it, I'm not getting any younger either. However, I'm
> far more concerned about the aerobic aspects of this effort. Can anyone
> suggest a training goal that will give me a sense of how far along I am
> in my conditioning (e.g., you need to be able to climb x feet per hour
> without pushing your heart rate above y% of it maximum)? Are there any
> meaningful benchmarks?

It will all be irrelevant once you are at that kind of altitude anyway.
Smile You'll be huffing and gasping no matter what your physical
condition is at your usual altitude.

--
Denise denise dot howard at comcast dot net
ACE and AFAA certified fitness instructor
AFAA step and kickboxing certified
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
caseydoug3

External


Since: Jul 14, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:24 am
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Denise Howard wrote:
> In article <1150007620.423023.237470 DeleteThis @h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> <caseydoug3 DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It will all be irrelevant once you are at that kind of altitude anyway.
> Smile You'll be huffing and gasping no matter what your physical
> condition is at your usual altitude.
>

Looking on the bright side, if I'm huffing and gasping, I'm not dead.
:>)
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ray

External


Since: Jun 14, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 11) Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:35 am
Post subject: Re: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

caseydoug3 DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
> I've been training for a guided summit attempt on Mount Rainier at the
> end of July. I'm in pretty good condition for my age (62), but I have
> no illusions about the difficulty of this climb. I would appreciate any
> thoughts about the most appropriate type of aerobic conditioning to do
> in the final months. In particular, I'd like to know how much benefit I
> would get from mixing some kind of interval training in with the rest
> of my workout.
>
> Currently, I try to take training hikes once or twice a week. These are
> fairly strenuous (for me), typically involving about 3500 feet of gain
> in four miles carrying a 40 pound pack -- Mount Si, for those of you
> who know it. The ascent takes a little under two hours. My heart rate
> stays between 140 - 160 the entire time, averaging around 150 (my heart
> rate maximum is naturally high, I think around 190). I also do the
> Stairmaster several times a week for about 45 minutes each. Again, I
> push myself pretty hard, with my heart rate often staying above 160 for
> 20 or 30 minutes in a session. Finally, I work out with weights three
> times a week for an hour each. I don't monitor my heart rate then, but
> I know it stays elevated for much of that time.
>
> I was thinking about trying to work some kind of interval training into
> one or two of my Stairmaster sessions each week. The idea would be to
> push my heart rate up over 170 for a couple of minutes, then let it
> drop back below 140 for a couple of minutes, and repeat this pattern
> for the entire session. I read that this is a good and quick way to
> increase aerobic capacity. I also read, however, that it may not be
> that helpful if your goal is endurance -- i.e., to maintain a hard pace
> for hours at a time. Any advice on this would be welcome.
>
> Also, are there any benchmarks to help me determine what kind of
> progress I've made to date -- some test to tell me how close I am to
> being ready (e.g., the time it takes to get up Mount Si or my average
> heart rate during that hike)? I don't expect to be the fittest or
> fastest person on the mountain, but I'd sure like to know whether I'm
> seriously behind where I need to be by this time.
>
> I do plan to get some altitude in shortly. I'm told that the effect of
> altitude varies from person to person. I hiked the Inca Trail two years
> ago (the second day has nearly 4000 feet of gain, up to about 13,800
> feet) without problem. However, I didn't carry much weight, and I also
> had a couple of days to acclimate.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
Google "Tabata Intervals" and see what you think. Maybe
consider incorporating them into your programme twice a week? They are
particularly effective when using a rower. 20 seconds almost max
intensity followed by 10 seconds rest for 4 minutes. But make sure you
are warmed up first. I am in my late fifties and they certainly seem to
have brought about an improvement in my aerobic and anerobic capacity.
 >> Stay informed about: Interval Conditioning for Mountain Climb? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Aerobics All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]