Welcome to TheFitnessForum.net!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Counting calories -- is it really necessary?

 
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Training & Fat Loss RSS
Related Topics:
The Truth About Counting Calories And Weight Loss - The Truth About Counting Calories And Weight Loss By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS Do calories matter or do you simply need to eat certain foods and that will guarantee you'll lose weight? Should you count..

Interesting Factoids: Calorie-Counting - Two of the same age, gender, height, weight and even the same level of fitness can burn a different amount of calories at the same level of average number of calories burned with an exercise is 100, will burn..

Calories Explained.(alphabetical list of calories in food) - list of calories in food, We can say the calorie is a unit of energy. We can't just associate calories with food because there is some energy there is a calorie involved. Gasoline for example, like so many other things contains a..

Calories in vegetable oil - I cant believe 1 table spoon of Corn Oil, Canola Oil , or Olive Oil = 120 One cheezy little of the stuff is soo many calories. Does anyone know if this number is reduced when frying it? Like frying lean chicken in corn oil. ..

Protein or Calories? - I posted earlier that I'm trying to lose about 4" of belly fat for the next 8 weeks for an upcoming charity event, while keeping as much muscle as possible. For now, my question is regarding protein and how much I should be getting. The..
Next:  How to measure body fat?  
Author Message
vmc

External


Since: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:38 pm
Post subject: Counting calories -- is it really necessary?
Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)

I've been lifting heavily now for 9 months. Up until two months ago,
however, I'd also been doing extreme amounts of cardio, really limiting
my gains. Since I quit the cardio, I've put on 12 pounds of mostly lean
mass. I think the beginner's gains are about up though, as my bodyfat
has finally started going up over the past few weeks.

I'd like to cut back and get my bodyfat level back down, and of course
I'd love to keep as much of the lean mass as I can. But I'm wondering
if it's really necessary to be so "scientific" about my diet in order
to accomplish this. I haven't the faintest idea what my caloric
requirements are -- before when I've tried to lose weight, I've simply
stopped eating so much and added more cardio. If I try this same
approach to cutting now (instead of meticulously counting calories and
nutrient proportions), will I lose a lot more muscle than I should?

My current plan is to continue the same lifting schedule, but throw in
a bit of cardio -- maybe running or biking 3x a week, or jogging for 15
minutes each day before lifting -- and just start eating a bit less and
a bit healthier, paying particular attention to the amount of protein I
get. Is this good enough? I only need to lose about 3-4 pounds of fat
to get to where I want to be.

 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roger Zoul

External


Since: Feb 27, 2005
Posts: 193



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

vmc wrote:
:: I've been lifting heavily now for 9 months. Up until two months ago,
:: however, I'd also been doing extreme amounts of cardio, really
:: limiting my gains. Since I quit the cardio, I've put on 12 pounds of
:: mostly lean mass. I think the beginner's gains are about up though,
:: as my bodyfat has finally started going up over the past few weeks.
::
:: I'd like to cut back and get my bodyfat level back down, and of
:: course I'd love to keep as much of the lean mass as I can. But I'm
:: wondering if it's really necessary to be so "scientific" about my
:: diet in order to accomplish this. I haven't the faintest idea what
:: my caloric requirements are -- before when I've tried to lose
:: weight, I've simply stopped eating so much and added more cardio. If
:: I try this same approach to cutting now (instead of meticulously
:: counting calories and nutrient proportions), will I lose a lot more
:: muscle than I should?
::
:: My current plan is to continue the same lifting schedule, but throw
:: in a bit of cardio -- maybe running or biking 3x a week, or jogging
:: for 15 minutes each day before lifting -- and just start eating a
:: bit less and a bit healthier, paying particular attention to the
:: amount of protein I get. Is this good enough? I only need to lose
:: about 3-4 pounds of fat to get to where I want to be.

Definitely keep lifting and getting sufficient protein.

As for the rest, well, it depends. the easiest way is to just eat less - go
hungry everyday until you finally lose the weight (mostly fat). But if you
want to keep eating the same, then add cardio. If you knew your maintenance
level of calories already, you'd have a place to start on counting. You
could spend a week or two to try to figure it out, or you could just start
eating at 10X your bodyweight in calories and see what happens. since you
only need to lose 3 or 4 lbs, I don't really see the big deal. You can lose
it inside a month.

 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Hugh Beyer

External


Since: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 481



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:00 am
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:393rm2F5to9rtU1@individual.net:

> vmc wrote:
>:: I've been lifting heavily now for 9 months. Up until two months ago,
>:: however, I'd also been doing extreme amounts of cardio, really
>:: limiting my gains. Since I quit the cardio, I've put on 12 pounds of
>:: mostly lean mass. I think the beginner's gains are about up though,
>:: as my bodyfat has finally started going up over the past few weeks.
>::
>:: I'd like to cut back and get my bodyfat level back down, and of
>:: course I'd love to keep as much of the lean mass as I can. But I'm
>:: wondering if it's really necessary to be so "scientific" about my
>:: diet in order to accomplish this. I haven't the faintest idea what
>:: my caloric requirements are -- before when I've tried to lose
>:: weight, I've simply stopped eating so much and added more cardio. If
>:: I try this same approach to cutting now (instead of meticulously
>:: counting calories and nutrient proportions), will I lose a lot more
>:: muscle than I should?
>::
>:: My current plan is to continue the same lifting schedule, but throw
>:: in a bit of cardio -- maybe running or biking 3x a week, or jogging
>:: for 15 minutes each day before lifting -- and just start eating a
>:: bit less and a bit healthier, paying particular attention to the
>:: amount of protein I get. Is this good enough? I only need to lose
>:: about 3-4 pounds of fat to get to where I want to be.
>
> Definitely keep lifting and getting sufficient protein.
>
> As for the rest, well, it depends. the easiest way is to just eat less
> - go hungry everyday until you finally lose the weight (mostly fat).
> But if you want to keep eating the same, then add cardio. If you knew
> your maintenance level of calories already, you'd have a place to start
> on counting. You could spend a week or two to try to figure it out, or
> you could just start eating at 10X your bodyweight in calories and see
> what happens. since you only need to lose 3 or 4 lbs, I don't really
> see the big deal. You can lose it inside a month.
>
>

Yeah, but he doesn't want to count.

You don't have to. If you keep lifting and get sufficient protein and eat
a little less than you are now, and keep reducing what you eat until you
start losing weight slowly, you will, to a first approximation, be fine.

Hugh


--
Experience keeps a dear school, but fools will attend no other.
 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
rick++

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 90



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Oprah's current diet is fairly simple.
She immediately trashes half of what she
gets in a restaurant order.
 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Hugh Beyer

External


Since: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 481



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:45 am
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"rick++" <rick303 RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in news:1110294886.357357.279780
@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

> Oprah's current diet is fairly simple.
> She immediately trashes half of what she
> gets in a restaurant order.
>
>

I did that back when I was travelling and eating in resturants a lot. I just
marked half the dish and that was mine--the rest went back to the kitchen.

Hard to tell yourself it's okay to waste food that way. But I decided it was
just as wasted if I ate it and it went into making me fat.

Hugh


--
Experience keeps a dear school, but fools will attend no other.
 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Larry Hodges

External


Since: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: 976



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:45 am
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hugh Beyer wrote:
> "rick++" <rick303 DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in news:1110294886.357357.279780
> @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Oprah's current diet is fairly simple.
>> She immediately trashes half of what she
>> gets in a restaurant order.
>>
>>
>
> I did that back when I was travelling and eating in resturants a lot.
> I just marked half the dish and that was mine--the rest went back to
> the kitchen.
>
> Hard to tell yourself it's okay to waste food that way. But I decided
> it was just as wasted if I ate it and it went into making me fat.
>
> Hugh

I'm chasing the elusive 10% BF, and the bastard is running away as fast as I
can chase him.
--
-Larry
 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roger Zoul

External


Since: Feb 27, 2005
Posts: 193



(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Larry Hodges wrote:
:: Hugh Beyer wrote:
::: "rick++" <rick303 DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in
::: news:1110294886.357357.279780 @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
:::
:::: Oprah's current diet is fairly simple.
:::: She immediately trashes half of what she
:::: gets in a restaurant order.
::::
::::
:::
::: I did that back when I was travelling and eating in resturants a
::: lot. I just marked half the dish and that was mine--the rest went
::: back to the kitchen.
:::
::: Hard to tell yourself it's okay to waste food that way. But I
::: decided it was just as wasted if I ate it and it went into making
::: me fat.
:::
::: Hugh
::
:: I'm chasing the elusive 10% BF, and the bastard is running away as
:: fast as I can chase him.

I can't blame the guy....if you only want him 10% of the time.

Smile
 >> Stay informed about: Counting calories -- is it really necessary? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Fitness Forums (Home) -> Weight Training & Fat Loss All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]