Bully

I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't use
any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But I'm
sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his equivocations. It's
quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you
that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character
counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to
be morally fit -- you're definitely a self-absorbed mafia don.

My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
What treachery! Others have stated it much more eloquently than I, but
"tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I always
catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you
that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked
Aggression of Bully". In it, I chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from
the perverted to the insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that
one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by
reference to the social condition and personal histories of the
scientists involved.

This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you that
they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized egotists
can go right ahead and convict me for saying that adversarialism is the
last refuge of the sick, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher
truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this
verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. I could be wrong about
any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of
history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong
or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

"Lordy.uk" <snarler03 DeleteThis @yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>What treachery!

Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!

Wankers!