Curt James wrote:
> msamson wrote:
> > I'm 6'2, 200 lbs (recently dropped 5 lbs) and have a 31.5" waist and 7"
> > wrist.
>
> How do you have a 31.5" waist? And how are you measuring that? Of
> course, Schuh's got a 26" waist, but he's, what, 5'9"?
>
> (adds msamson to Those Most Hated list)
>
Measured first thing in the morning with a soft tape measure right
around on top of the belly button (if I measured higher it would be
even smaller). I was at 35" a few months ago but cut out all carbs
except for fruit and veggies. I was at 215 and just by doing this I
went down to 205. I have recently dropped another 5 lbs due to
surgery (septoplasty) and not being able to workout. When I had the
35" waist I was eating bread, buns, garlic cheese bread, and rice milk
later in the evening. I cut all that though and eat very clean. Carbs
remain from fruits/veggies but also with a slice or 2 of whole rye
bread daily.
> > According to the book The Omega Zone, and subtracting my wrist
> > measurement from my waist measurement and looking it up in the chart
> > across my weight, it indicates that I have 7% BF.
>
> That's hilarious. You take your wrist measurement and subtract it from
> your waist measurement as the basis for your percent? How does that
> even begin to make sense?
>
> Say you've got a monster guy who's got 9" wrists a Branch Warren-type
> waist. You're saying that The Omega Zone chart is going to put you at a
> lower BF than the guy on juice and cut to the bone? No.
There is a chart in the book and for males you take the waist and
subtract the rest and then look up THAT number against your weight.
For females there is no wrist measurement...just waist, hips, and
height.
> > This is the lowest it's been since I was about 22 (I'm 30 now).
>
> Could you see abs at 22?
>
A little bit...more than I have now but I also only weighed 185. I had
my BF tested with calipers at that time and apparently I was 7%.
> The number means nothing, imo. Look at the mirror instead. Sure, it's
> nice to see a number drop as you diet, but you're interested in visible
> abs. You're not interested in waving around a printout or an index card
> with "Johnny's percent bodyfat is 2 today."
I rather guage progress on BF and scale than scale alone. As using
only scale doesn't show muscle loss/gain. When I weighed 215 a few
months ago according to this "book method" I was 13%. So even if it's
not accurate, I did make some progress and lost BF% in some capacity.
But as I mentioned, I have some AccuMeasure calipers in the mail and
from what I have heard they are accurate to +/- 2% so if it correlates
to the "Zone" method then that will show that it's actually a not bad
method to use.
> > Although I have some cuts on the outside of my mid-section and
> > obliques, I still don't have abdominal definition. Sure my mid section
> > is lean and completely flat...
>
> Are you doing weighted crunches? What's your ab routine? Sets, reps?
> Diet? Cardio?
My ab routine is 4 sets of 25 ab board sit ups in a very slow movement
concentrating on the eccentric motion before every single workout, and
then a few times per week I also do more ab work AFTER the workout
which typically entails Roman Chair leg raises with straight leg and
hold the position and slowly release, hanging off a chin bar knee
raises, lying on back leg raises, and holding stiff legs 6" off ground
as long as I can. That's about it.
> Define reasonably.
The appearance of some definition...so abs can be seen....I don't think
i'll ever be able to have a 6 pack since my lower 2 abs are like one
flat sheet...kinda like Arnold. But a 4 pack would be nice.
Thanks for your response Curt.
If anyone wants to humour themselves i'd be happy to look up your
measurements in the Zone book:
You need your exact waist measurement in inches at the BELLY BUTTON and
subtract your wrist measurement in inches on your right hand right
between the bone of your thumb and wrist.....If I have that calculation
and your weight, I can look up the BF% number for you.
>> Stay informed about: What BF% are abs visible?