|
Related Topics:
| Losing Body Fat, But Not Gaining Muscle Mass - Advice? - Hi, Since January I have managed to lose nearly 2 stone in weight, dropping from about 14st 8lbs (36" waist) down to 12st 12lbs (now a 34" waist). Just as I started my exercise regime I brought some fancy scales, that are meant to be able to
Brand new diet site launched - A brand new diet site has been launched:
Getting too fat -- need cutting advice - I'm currently 6'6" 270 and and have been lifting steadily for 9 months after a couple years off. I've been bulking for 3 months and have developed an admirable gut. I was gonna wait till the spring to cut but feel like I'm letting it get away from
Fitting alcohol into diet plans - I'm currently on a ~3000 kcal/day diet; 35% from protein, 45% from carbs, 20% from fat. If I wanted to have a beer or two this weekend, I'm wondering where's the most logical place to swap out some calories from my diet. Should I cut back on fat or..
Questions about Athletes and Dietary Supplements - Dear Sir and Madam: I am a student at the of Northern Iowa, and I am very in Athletes and Dietary because I use dietary as part of my training; and I am writing a report about this topic. I..
|
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: May 28, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:39 am
Post subject: Adding Mass / Losing Fat Archived from groups: misc>fitness>weights (more info?)
|
|
|
I haven't posted here in many years -- even then, I rarely posted and
mostly just read.
This is the first time I've been back in awhile so I apologize in
advance if this has already
been discussed, but...
The last time I checked (5+ years ago), it was understood that it's
not possible to add
muscle mass and lose fat simultaneously (except for the rank
beginner). Has any more
been learned about the mechanism(s) involved, and why this is so?
I've recently
started lifting again and was wondering if it would be possible to
lift heavy maybe
twice a week while maintaining a caloric surplus during the day you
lift and the day
after, and then go into a caloric deficit for the remaining three days
of the week. If
you ate at 500 calories over maintenance calories for four days a week
and had
a 1000 calorie deficit on the other three days, the net deficit would
be 1000
calories / week, which would be a little over a pound lost per month.
Doesn't
sound like much, but it could (theoretically) add up to 12-14 pounds
lost per
year while maintaining (or even gaining a little) muscle mass. Of
course, the
numbers could be tweaked to find the optimal balance -- I'm thinking
that the
lifting days might need a little more than 500 and the next day a
little less, but
again, I don't know if it's yet understood exactly how large the
caloric surplus
needs to be and for how long.
Sorry to be long-winded, but I'm hoping someone knowledgeable like
Lyle (if
he's still around) or someone else can set me straight. Thanks. >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 18, 2007 Posts: 53
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 12:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<familyspeer.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180370392.417727.167360@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>I haven't posted here in many years -- even then, I rarely posted and
> mostly just read.
> This is the first time I've been back in awhile so I apologize in
> advance if this has already
> been discussed, but...
>
> The last time I checked (5+ years ago), it was understood that it's
> not possible to add
> muscle mass and lose fat simultaneously (except for the rank
> beginner). Has any more
> been learned about the mechanism(s) involved, and why this is so?
> I've recently
> started lifting again and was wondering if it would be possible to
> lift heavy maybe
> twice a week while maintaining a caloric surplus during the day you
> lift and the day
> after, and then go into a caloric deficit for the remaining three days
> of the week. If
> you ate at 500 calories over maintenance calories for four days a week
> and had
> a 1000 calorie deficit on the other three days, the net deficit would
> be 1000
> calories / week, which would be a little over a pound lost per month.
> Doesn't
> sound like much, but it could (theoretically) add up to 12-14 pounds
> lost per
> year while maintaining (or even gaining a little) muscle mass. Of
> course, the
> numbers could be tweaked to find the optimal balance -- I'm thinking
> that the
> lifting days might need a little more than 500 and the next day a
> little less, but
> again, I don't know if it's yet understood exactly how large the
> caloric surplus
> needs to be and for how long.
>
> Sorry to be long-winded, but I'm hoping someone knowledgeable like
> Lyle (if
> he's still around) or someone else can set me straight. Thanks.
>
There is still a great deal of debate about this topic. I can tell you that
I was able to gain muscle and lose fat in the last 3-4 months. I had not
been training consistently for a few years and really got back into about 4
months ago. I also used to be a competitive bodybuilder, so I had a lot of
muscle in the past that most people don't. I keep my calories a bit below
maintenance and while I did not take any body fat measurements, I can tell
you that I went from wearing 30" jeans to 28" jeans. My weight went from 190
all the way down to about 160 or so. I am now back to about 185 and still am
wearing the 28" jeans. I have been taking in more calories that last month
or so, but still eating cleanly. If someone has had muscle before, it is
easier to get it back via muscle memory. That is why it was not a big deal
for me to lose fat and gain muscle at the same time. I think that the
average person should start out getting rid of as much fat as possible and
then gaining the muscle.
--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
http://www.hardbopdrums.com/ >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 31, 2006 Posts: 250
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 2:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<familyspeer.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180370392.417727.167360@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Sorry to be long-winded, but I'm hoping someone knowledgeable like
> Lyle (if
> he's still around) or someone else can set me straight. Thanks.
You can find Lyle at his website www.bodyrecomposition.com >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 15, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<familyspeer RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180370392.417727.167360@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>I haven't posted here in many years -- even then, I rarely posted and
> mostly just read.
> This is the first time I've been back in awhile so I apologize in
> advance if this has already
> been discussed, but...
>
> The last time I checked (5+ years ago), it was understood that it's
> not possible to add
> muscle mass and lose fat simultaneously (except for the rank
> beginner). Has any more
> been learned about the mechanism(s) involved, and why this is so?
> I've recently
> started lifting again and was wondering if it would be possible to
> lift heavy maybe
> twice a week while maintaining a caloric surplus during the day you
> lift and the day
> after, and then go into a caloric deficit for the remaining three days
> of the week. If
> you ate at 500 calories over maintenance calories for four days a week
> and had
> a 1000 calorie deficit on the other three days, the net deficit would
> be 1000
> calories / week, which would be a little over a pound lost per month.
> Doesn't
> sound like much, but it could (theoretically) add up to 12-14 pounds
> lost per
> year while maintaining (or even gaining a little) muscle mass. Of
> course, the
> numbers could be tweaked to find the optimal balance -- I'm thinking
> that the
> lifting days might need a little more than 500 and the next day a
> little less, but
> again, I don't know if it's yet understood exactly how large the
> caloric surplus
> needs to be and for how long.
>
> Sorry to be long-winded, but I'm hoping someone knowledgeable like
> Lyle (if
> he's still around) or someone else can set me straight. Thanks.
>
I'm definitely no expert, but from the posts that I've read here, I gather
that muscle doesn't just grow immediately after doing a workout, it repairs
and grows over a few days, so you would need to have a calorie surplus for
those few days. I.e. if you had a surplus for the 1st - 4th days that you
were lifting, your muscles would still be repairing themselves on the 5th,
6th & possibly 7th days so you would still need a calorie surplus!
That's my understanding of the process, I could be completely wrong though!
And I'm sure someone else here will correct me if so!
Ben >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 15, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 18, 2007 Posts: 53
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
These 2 are basic plagiarisms of one another. Did you read them and NOT see
the similarities?
--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche
http://www.hardbopdrums.com/
"benb" <benb DeleteThis @nospam.postalias> wrote in message
news:DYidnSl9Z-NN18bbnZ2dnUVZ8tyqnZ2d@bt.com...
> "benb" <benb DeleteThis @nospam.postalias> wrote in message
>>
>> I'm definitely no expert, but from the posts that I've read here, I
>> gather that muscle doesn't just grow immediately after doing a workout,
>> it repairs and grows over a few days, so you would need to have a calorie
>> surplus for those few days. I.e. if you had a surplus for the 1st - 4th
>> days that you were lifting, your muscles would still be repairing
>> themselves on the 5th, 6th & possibly 7th days so you would still need a
>> calorie surplus!
>>
>> That's my understanding of the process, I could be completely wrong
>> though! And I'm sure someone else here will correct me if so!
>>
>> Ben
>
> P.S. Here are a few articles I found on the net that might help!
> http://ezinearticles.com/?Melt-Away-Excess-Body-Fat-And-Leave-Your-Mus...s-Rock-!&id=579806
> http://muscle-gain-truth.blogspot.com/2007/04/melt-away-excess-body-fa...nd-leav
> >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 15, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 9:57 am
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yeah, I did, but one was a bit more cut down, and quicker to read, the other
went into more detail, so I thought I'd give both!
"Hard Bop Drums" <nospam.TakeThisOut@hardbopdrums.com> wrote in message
news:KBI6i.4228$OJ1.3969@newsfe13.phx...
> These 2 are basic plagiarisms of one another. Did you read them and NOT
> see the similarities?
>
> --
> Robert Schuh
> "Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
> intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
> the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
> the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
> - Nietzsche
>
> http://www.hardbopdrums.com/
>
>
> "benb" <benb.TakeThisOut@nospam.postalias> wrote in message
> news:DYidnSl9Z-NN18bbnZ2dnUVZ8tyqnZ2d@bt.com...
>> "benb" <benb.TakeThisOut@nospam.postalias> wrote in message
>>>
>>> I'm definitely no expert, but from the posts that I've read here, I
>>> gather that muscle doesn't just grow immediately after doing a workout,
>>> it repairs and grows over a few days, so you would need to have a
>>> calorie surplus for those few days. I.e. if you had a surplus for the
>>> 1st - 4th days that you were lifting, your muscles would still be
>>> repairing themselves on the 5th, 6th & possibly 7th days so you would
>>> still need a calorie surplus!
>>>
>>> That's my understanding of the process, I could be completely wrong
>>> though! And I'm sure someone else here will correct me if so!
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>> P.S. Here are a few articles I found on the net that might help!
>> http://ezinearticles.com/?Melt-Away-Excess-Body-Fat-And-Leave-Your-Mus...s-Rock-!&id=579806
>> http://muscle-gain-truth.blogspot.com/2007/04/melt-away-excess-body-fa...nd-leav
>>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 28, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Adding Mass / Losing Fat [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On May 29, 1:57 am, "benb" <b....RemoveThis@nospam.postalias> wrote:
> Yeah, I did, but one was a bit more cut down, and quicker to read, the other
> went into more detail, so I thought I'd give both!
>
> "Hard Bop Drums" <nos....RemoveThis@hardbopdrums.com> wrote in messagenews:KBI6i.4228$OJ1.3969@newsfe13.phx...
>
>
>
> > These 2 are basic plagiarisms of one another. Did you read them and NOT
> > see the similarities?
>
> > --
> > Robert Schuh
> > "Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
> > intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
> > the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
> > the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
> > - Nietzsche
>
> >http://www.hardbopdrums.com/
>
> > "benb" <b....RemoveThis@nospam.postalias> wrote in message
> >news:DYidnSl9Z-NN18bbnZ2dnUVZ8tyqnZ2d@bt.com...
> >> "benb" <b....RemoveThis@nospam.postalias> wrote in message
>
> >>> I'm definitely no expert, but from the posts that I've read here, I
> >>> gather that muscle doesn't just grow immediately after doing a workout,
> >>> it repairs and grows over a few days, so you would need to have a
> >>> calorie surplus for those few days. I.e. if you had a surplus for the
> >>> 1st - 4th days that you were lifting, your muscles would still be
> >>> repairing themselves on the 5th, 6th & possibly 7th days so you would
> >>> still need a calorie surplus!
>
> >>> That's my understanding of the process, I could be completely wrong
> >>> though! And I'm sure someone else here will correct me if so!
>
> >>> Ben
>
> >> P.S. Here are a few articles I found on the net that might help!
> >>http://ezinearticles.com/?Melt-Away-Excess-Body-Fat-And-Leave-Your-Mu...
> >>http://muscle-gain-truth.blogspot.com/2007/04/melt-away-excess-body-f...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
As Rob pointed out, there is still a lot of uncertainty. I'm
wondering if, in fact, it's not the surplus / deficit
of calories that is important, but the level of protein intake. It
would only be natural to reduce the amount
of protein consumed when in a caloric deficit state, but there are
some foods that would allow you to
maintain high levels of protein and still keep the calories under
maintenance. I recently found some
non-fat Greek yogurt at Trader Joe's that has 50 grams of protein and
only 250 calories. Similarly, they
carry turkey jerky that is way high in protein but low in calories.
If you were very selective in what you eat
during the low-cal phase, you could still consume the requisite gram
of protein per pound of lean mass and
still keep the calories well under maintenance.
One (or both) of the links given states that the benefits from cardio
are derived from their effect on metabolism
when at rest (I'm paraphrasing) and not the calories burned during the
cardio itself. Is this generally accepted
as fact? It seems to me that walking ~4 miles is going to burn
roughly 400 calories immediately, regardless
of its effect on resting metabolism. And is walking necessarily going
to be catabolic?
Jon Speer >> Stay informed about: Adding Mass / Losing Fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|